Mainly thinking about this because of some of the comments in this post here, but I do think while what we currently have right now is way too much regulation.
Some examples of 'good regulation' in my opinion would be the existence of drivers' licenses, 'right to repair' laws, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and building codes.
While some notable 'bad regulation' is anything to do with 2A restrictions and the modern health care industry.
Overall, I'm just trying to gauge what is good vs bad regulation.
It is the dose that makes the poison.
Ignorant and incorrect, as per your usual. Quite a few things are lethal at any dose, or else something you don't want to intake. Dimethyl mercury for example, or iodine 131.
They can have uses, but it doesn't make them not inherently poisonous.
And some toxic chemicals build up in the system over time, while the body's unable to clean it out fast enough.
Fun fact: Higher doses of I-131 can be less dangerous than low does because the high dose kills cell while the lower doses mutate them into cancer. So Antonio is right, in that case sort of. Just probably not for the right reasons.
Iodine in this instance being one of those things "you don't want to intake", as I said in the last part of the sentence.
If somebody said you could fund roads by making everyone in the town take a shot of iodine 131 once a year, you'd hang the fucker.
Do you not know well-known proverbs? Regardless, even something that is not poison, like olive oil, can kill you if you consume enough of it.
Do you not know highschool chemistry?
Do... you even read your own posts or just downvote his automatically? That is a restatement of the same concept and you just lash out automatically