So you'd be okay with mossad going in and killing these people individually?
You're over here going to bat for killing civilians. Do you really want to take the moral high ground here?
I'm going to guess you were on the side of the Israeli prison guard who said he HAD to rape a prisoner with an iron bar because it was self defense. 'cause you know, restraining a guy and repeatedly sodomizing him with a foreign object is just something that happens.
again, assuming they are actual terrorists plotting to attack israel, yes.
the question of whether or not they are actually targeting terrorists vs random disconnected people who understandably hate Israel is another question entirely.
he has 10% of a point, jew that he is. if your enemy's civilians are completely supportive of your enemy (understandably) and let them use these tactics you have little recourse but to just start killing the supportive civilians too.
if they're not completely supportive, then they're completely incompetent and ought be receptive to being evacuated/selected through by the invading force so as to get rid of the combatant force in their midst they don't want there.
if they're not supportive, incompetent, and not receptive, then you have to revert to the medieval tactics of just killing civilians if you feel like it, otherwise your war is literally impossible (as we saw with the US having to leave the middle east instead of glassing it). the idea of civilians being sacred is a modern development, after all.
of course, this is all philosophical musing and speculation. i'd much rather the mohammedans win, they're an easier enemy after israel is gone.
I think you are a terrorist. I said it, you have no chance to refute the claims before or after an attempt on your life which could easily kill your family is made. How confident are you in my assessment? Would you be willing to stake your life on my judgment?
You know an easy way to determine if someone is a terrorist (or otherwise an enemy)? If they're a member of a group whose stated goal is your destruction.
How else are they supposed to get rid of the terrorists, when they only hide among innocent people?
Just curious
actual covert ops, just like every other country in the world. you don't kill civilians, even by accident, unless you want to breed more terrorists.
So you'd be okay with mossad going in and killing these people individually?
The civilians also hate the jews, so I'm not surprised Israel doesn't really care
You're over here going to bat for killing civilians. Do you really want to take the moral high ground here?
I'm going to guess you were on the side of the Israeli prison guard who said he HAD to rape a prisoner with an iron bar because it was self defense. 'cause you know, restraining a guy and repeatedly sodomizing him with a foreign object is just something that happens.
IDK, maybe he's a FATAL GM or something.
No, I actually said if he's guilty he should be in jail (and I wouldn't feel bad if he got the same done to him).
Collateral damage in war happens. That's reality.
Maybe you guys are just npcs too.
again, assuming they are actual terrorists plotting to attack israel, yes.
the question of whether or not they are actually targeting terrorists vs random disconnected people who understandably hate Israel is another question entirely.
Do you think Britain would have stomped out the IRA with a bombing campaign?
rent. free.
Holy shit, dude. Did you think before you wrote that?
We’re seeing the tribe reveal their absolute sociopathy in real time here.
Yes, I did. When terrorists (who are trying to kill you) hide among innocent people, how are you supposed to kill them first?
This isn't a war where carpet bombing is cool, and there aren't military targets. So I'm asking, what do the galaxy brains here think should be done?
Assume the terrorists are actual terrorists and should be taken out.
I have no words.
he has 10% of a point, jew that he is. if your enemy's civilians are completely supportive of your enemy (understandably) and let them use these tactics you have little recourse but to just start killing the supportive civilians too.
if they're not completely supportive, then they're completely incompetent and ought be receptive to being evacuated/selected through by the invading force so as to get rid of the combatant force in their midst they don't want there.
if they're not supportive, incompetent, and not receptive, then you have to revert to the medieval tactics of just killing civilians if you feel like it, otherwise your war is literally impossible (as we saw with the US having to leave the middle east instead of glassing it). the idea of civilians being sacred is a modern development, after all.
of course, this is all philosophical musing and speculation. i'd much rather the mohammedans win, they're an easier enemy after israel is gone.
Okay, so you don't kill the terrorists, and they kill you (and rape your wife and kids). How does your moral high ground feel?
Retarded takes on combat on this sub.
I think you are a terrorist. I said it, you have no chance to refute the claims before or after an attempt on your life which could easily kill your family is made. How confident are you in my assessment? Would you be willing to stake your life on my judgment?
You know an easy way to determine if someone is a terrorist (or otherwise an enemy)? If they're a member of a group whose stated goal is your destruction.
I know this is hard, but use your brain cells.