and now we are having debates on whether to take them in or not? lmao
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
“They weren’t slaves; they were given the choice between sexually pleasing the men or death” is just arguing semantics.
I don't think so. They didn't even have to cite which man. It's a pretty easy call. It's still forced marriage, but it's not sex slavery. It's a better deal than even the Uighurs are getting.