Im of hong kong descent. Best percentage is 75% asian and 25% white. 75% because they still look asian. And 25% for the bigger eyes and more pointy face.
She seemed to use her name, connections and notoriety to broker deals behind the scenes and manage, but never publicly acknowledged AFAICT that she was in anyway involved with the enterprise or lent her name, image or following to the brand from an influencer or commentator sense.
The indictment documents indicate she was being paid 96k a year to manage the company along with some possible 8k payments to sign Pool and Rubin.
I guess it all comes down to whether you believe that she was able to put an editorial wall between her back channel endeavors and her public facing personalized commentary.
Nothing I've seen in the indictment suggests that her benefactors were paying to influence her actual personalized branded content on her channel.
Personally, I have the possibly naive/optimistic view that all her Zionist criticism, repeal the 19th, mild Trump criticism and Groyper adjacent personal public views have absolutely nothing to do with possible foreign influence meddling.
here's a downloadable version of the video https://cdn.videy.co/QSzeGAKS.mp4
Also letting everyone know, Lauren Chen is half Hong Konger, not mainland Chinese.
Half Cantonese, half white, 100% flawless
Im of hong kong descent. Best percentage is 75% asian and 25% white. 75% because they still look asian. And 25% for the bigger eyes and more pointy face.
Chen was a silent partner in the Tenet startup.
She seemed to use her name, connections and notoriety to broker deals behind the scenes and manage, but never publicly acknowledged AFAICT that she was in anyway involved with the enterprise or lent her name, image or following to the brand from an influencer or commentator sense.
The indictment documents indicate she was being paid 96k a year to manage the company along with some possible 8k payments to sign Pool and Rubin.
I guess it all comes down to whether you believe that she was able to put an editorial wall between her back channel endeavors and her public facing personalized commentary.
Nothing I've seen in the indictment suggests that her benefactors were paying to influence her actual personalized branded content on her channel.
Personally, I have the possibly naive/optimistic view that all her Zionist criticism, repeal the 19th, mild Trump criticism and Groyper adjacent personal public views have absolutely nothing to do with possible foreign influence meddling.
After 10 years of muh Russia, I don't trust any accusations coming from the government and its media mouthpieces