A few people had mentioned that 'Twisters' didn't invoke climate change, so I thought cool -- a few special effects and a fun few hours.
Then it starts -- two white chicks and three pajeets! And... there are, actually, some astonishingly good-looking pajeets, but they chose the weak-chinned losers, of course.
I lasted about five minutes.
I wish we could put pajeets, chicks and (the rule-16 people) on an island, and see what they'd create.
We all know that they'd do nothing but argue.
But hey, Madame Curie was, like, super good at putting samples into a machine that she didn't build.
Sorry, just ranting.
In a "natural" setting, those women wouldn't be doing nothing. They would be caring for babies and young children. If society advanced enough, cleaning, cooking, making clothes and helping with farming.
We can't have a normal functional repartition of labour under feminism. That would be "misoginy".
The women would also be slaughtering/butchering the pigs in a natural setting.
Women are capable of lots of things if they're guided by the patriarchy.
Without the patriarchy... well, they just try to show off their asses and complain.
I haven't seen that as much in the homesteading community. The women mostly garden and take care of the kids. The men are the ones usually handling the animals and doing the butchering. In the older days I'm sure women were tougher and able to handle it, but at least somewhat nowadays, the gender roles have somewhat defined what men and women are doing on a farm/homestead to more align with who is better at what.
I live in Cambodia these days, and the women here are tough.
Real butchers are still usually men, because they have to do it all day long. But if I bought a full pig, some chick would cut it up.
Things aren't perfect here, but if you're looking for a rough 'equality of sexes', then it's basically paradise. I don't think it's the kind of paradise that feminists are looking for, though.