Underage girls were stabbed at a Southport Taylor Swift dance class, conflicting information about the attacker but he's believed to be underage himself
Why the ever loving fuck are you describing it this way?
The girls were 3 years old. Almost everyone else is calling them "children" as is a far more accurate label.
The attacker was 17. Which by some metric isn't a child and of both legal voting and marriage age even in the UK, so most certainly isn't a child.
Calling them both "underage" is both retarded and misleading because it could lead someone to think the ages involved were similar.
If you’re talking about some sort of victim privacy law that prevents the media from reporting ages, then it seems like the information has already leaked. And the fact that you didn’t say “that’s unconfirmed,” or “that’s speculative,” even after running defense about it not being confirmed Islamic, makes me think you believe that what the guy you’re replying to said is correct. Also, you’re not a media organization, so why not be clear about the ages?
If the law also prevents you as a private citizen from communicating what you believe to be the case, honestly, I think you’re already fucked in general just by posting here if anyone investigates your account and links it to you IRL, so, again, why not be clear about the ages?
If this law prevents you from communicating clearly in general, yeah, I guess you’re doing a great job following it. Thanks.
Why the ever loving fuck are you describing it this way?
The girls were 3 years old. Almost everyone else is calling them "children" as is a far more accurate label.
The attacker was 17. Which by some metric isn't a child and of both legal voting and marriage age even in the UK, so most certainly isn't a child.
Calling them both "underage" is both retarded and misleading because it could lead someone to think the ages involved were similar.
If you’re talking about some sort of victim privacy law that prevents the media from reporting ages, then it seems like the information has already leaked. And the fact that you didn’t say “that’s unconfirmed,” or “that’s speculative,” even after running defense about it not being confirmed Islamic, makes me think you believe that what the guy you’re replying to said is correct. Also, you’re not a media organization, so why not be clear about the ages?
If the law also prevents you as a private citizen from communicating what you believe to be the case, honestly, I think you’re already fucked in general just by posting here if anyone investigates your account and links it to you IRL, so, again, why not be clear about the ages?
If this law prevents you from communicating clearly in general, yeah, I guess you’re doing a great job following it. Thanks.