You keep making non-sequitur replies like they're supposed to mean something and I keep trying to figure out the steps you skipped under the presumption that your short term memory isn't more stroked out than Biden's and you aren't schizophrenically reading words that aren't there.
For example you didn't ask where the only salvation is overpowering was established. You asked where the only salvation is unthinking racialism was established. Those are two completely different, unlinked statements. They're not interchangable unless you completely redefine multiple words' meanings.
Insisting you can't just redefine meanings retroactively isn't being spastic, it's just not being someone's stupid bitch. It's the same principle by which I won't let someone put words in my mouth that a man with his dick tucked in a dress is a woman.
Those are two completely different, unlinked statements. They're not interchangable unless you completely redefine multiple words' meanings.
They’re linked by the context you retard. You said the following two statements in the same response to me:
Of course [unthinking racialism can be a good thing]
When your only salvation is overpowering a people unified in their desire to enslave you, the coordinated strength of an unthinking racial blob might just be the right tool for the job.
Then I replied directly to that notion with:
Where has it been established that unthinking racialism is the only salvation for checks notes unthinking racialism?
The entire reason you’re shitting your pants right now is because I ignored your use of “might be”, because IN CONTEXT you are obviously arguing that it is. If you need the word “might” to be present in my question to avoid you getting shit everywhere, here you go champ:
Where has it been established that unthinking racialism MIGHT BE the only salvation for checks notes unthinking racialism?
Happy now champ? Can you manage a response that doesn’t tangent to chix with dix?
No straw man, the Keyword was “unthinking”
What? Ok maybe I do need to tone down the reading difficulty.
You put made up words in my mouth about how racialism was the only solution, to then attack that statement. That is what a strawman is.
Autistically hyperfocusing on another word in the sentence doesn't make the claim that I said racialism is the only answer any less fabricated.
Quit acting like a fucking spastic.
YOU quoted ME saying “unthinking”, I didn’t add it after the fact. I said unthinking racialism can’t be both good and bad, you said “of course it can”
Then you went on to say “ When your only salvation is overpowering”
I asked where that had been established as a fact
Calm your tits
Is English your second language or something?
You keep making non-sequitur replies like they're supposed to mean something and I keep trying to figure out the steps you skipped under the presumption that your short term memory isn't more stroked out than Biden's and you aren't schizophrenically reading words that aren't there.
For example you didn't ask where the only salvation is overpowering was established. You asked where the only salvation is unthinking racialism was established. Those are two completely different, unlinked statements. They're not interchangable unless you completely redefine multiple words' meanings.
Insisting you can't just redefine meanings retroactively isn't being spastic, it's just not being someone's stupid bitch. It's the same principle by which I won't let someone put words in my mouth that a man with his dick tucked in a dress is a woman.
They’re linked by the context you retard. You said the following two statements in the same response to me:
Then I replied directly to that notion with:
The entire reason you’re shitting your pants right now is because I ignored your use of “might be”, because IN CONTEXT you are obviously arguing that it is. If you need the word “might” to be present in my question to avoid you getting shit everywhere, here you go champ:
Happy now champ? Can you manage a response that doesn’t tangent to chix with dix?