The difference between google search results and Yandex search results.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (24)
sorted by:
i remember a time when google used to give out similar search results as yandex, and then google became more and more corporate and controlled and now we have this.
I remember when Wikipedia used to have a global map with average country IQ.
The next information to be banned? Crime rate by race?
Ask anything it anti-Russia.
No search engine is perfect. Yandex is good for looking shit up that makes the West look bad, and other alternate topics (like porn), but Google is decent for looking up very basic stuff that isn't political.
And bing is in the corner eating glue, though it's okay for mature content I guess?
I imagine the kind of blanket restrictions Alphabet employs couldn't possibly be isolated to specific search topics only, not to mention how they mess with results in "sensitive" non-political areas. I have been hearing for at least 5 years from normie channels about the "Internet disappearing" because Google fucked up their algorithms and can't or won't fix it.
two sides of the same turd
in what way? yandex is more accurate to what should come out, whereas google is obviously controlling the search results and is more corporate
Hah, dropped your annoying schtick just to name the jews
FWoC is based dude, actually try and read what he’s saying some times. It can be opaque, but it also contains genius
in a purely genetic way, there are advantages to race mixing as it generally make stronger genes and healthier children. We see this in all mammals throughout the world, including humans.
In a cultural sense, race mixing is neither a positive nor negative. Racial tensions typically show up when mass migration or marxist theory is a factor. Ironically, efforts to separate races within a community only increases racial tensions because pockets of hyper-fixated groups tend to grow wary of eachother.
I know you're going to "nu-uh" me to hell and back, So I'll just end this by saying go outside.
Hey niggerfaggot, the comparison is about which search engines return the most precise results, not whether the results are nice or not.
If this confuses your sub 90 IQ brain, then by all means screech some more.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
This is closer to rule 3. Calm the fuck down, what the hell is wrong with you?
Oh no, the stasi is here to make sure I can't put retards in their place.
Both searches result in insane ramblings from faggot journalists. No studies, no medical reports, no data.
hence they are both shit
Irrelevant. The resulting pages need to contain what you searched for. A search of "why is race mixing bad" is already biased, so the search results should skew that way and answer the question, perhaps with a few counterpoints mixed in if the result pages contain them.
This has nothing to do with which is the better search engine.
because I was talking about the results, not the quality of the search engine
Races segregate themselves in their living and daily activities. Shit you can see this just every single day with people walking around a city, whites with whites, blacks definitely with blacks. There's some mixing but it's not equal. When they are forced to live together that's when there is tension. You're basically arguing the opposite of reality with regard to cultural integration. The willing segregation of races is an observable science.
Further, mixed race marriages fail at a significantly higher rate than non mixed marriages. This is a scientific fact.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - identity Attacks, particularly against a user.
Interesting how this post was irrelevant, until one argument against race segregation is made, and all of a sudden several accounts swarm it overnight.
Do you really think that an Australian Abo marrying a Norseman leads to 'stronger genes and healthier children'? I suspect that what you're referring to is more along the lines of: try not to marry your cousins.
ran out of accounts?