Kirsche dissects Upper Echelon's DEI video in autistic detail
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
This is two hours of my life I'm not getting back.
Kirsche goes into primary sources on BRIDGE here as she watches Upper Echelon (once again) draw incorrect conclusions about DEI ending due to the departments being dissolved.
Those departments were cancer. And them being removed is because Ideological Metastasis has happened.
Infested companies don't need to spend the money on a specialized organ once the cancer is everywhere. Kirsche plays internal videos documenting the pivot away from Equity in the branding, pointing out that BRIDGE is all about dissolving the DEI departments and making their goals organizational imperatives rather than the focus of a single department. A lot of the time, this means hiring consultants to ensure the DEI is omnipresent, rather than having a department which can become a target of lawfare.
Upper Echelon concludes his video by saying DEI is on the decline... whereas Kirsche cites their own internal videos saying that "the work will continue" under a different name. I know which one I trust: the words of the ideologues as spoken to their faithful, as relayed by Kirsche-- not Upper Echelon.
Thank you for the summery. Seriously. I was thinking about watching it, saw the video length, and was going to bite the bullet regardless - but this saves me the trouble.
I would actually suggest visiting the video even if you don't watch it since there's a list of primary sources in the description, a goodly number of which are archived:
https://archive.ph/8JAln -- WSJ (On the 2016 McKinsey study not meaning diversity pays out with increased profits)
https://archive.ph/8JAln -- Business Insider (Microsoft DEI firings; reiteration of commitment to diversity)
https://archive.ph/GPbiM -- Bloomberg (Zoom DEI department layoffs; reiteration of commitment to Diversity.)
https://archive.ph/HcfQR -- WaPo (Zoom and Snap cut DEI roles; "At Zoom, chief operating officer Aparna Bawa told employees that the company would replace its internal DEI team with DEI consultants who would “champion inclusion by embedding our values … directly into our people programs rather than as a separate initiative,” according to a Jan. 29 memo seen by The Post.")
The common thread here is that all of the departments are being dismantled, but the initiatives are being continued-- either organizationally or under different names. "We disbanded our DEI department" doesn't mean they're abandoning the ideology. The rock has been lifted and the bugs are seeking new cover. That is all.
Upper Echelon sort of goes mask off for a bit, too. He talks about how Diversity & Inclusion aren't bad things... and it's either out of ignorance, not understanding that these are subverted terms, or willfully reading only the most positive meanings into them (intentionally taking leftist / motte positions at face value.) After watching him fumble around like a normie encountering leftist language for the first time, I have begun to think less of him.
Here's the timestamp from the original Upper Echelon vid, where he says: "there's nothing wrong with Diversity, Equity, or Inclusion..." The lad doesn't get it. The promises of higher revenue were entryism for the woke. Lies, to be sure, but useful ones for the left.
Whether he's being intentionally daft or not is an open question. I know I unsubbed from him the last time he was this stupid. I can't unsub more or harder, even though I sorely want to.
He's YouTuber stupid, and it drives me crazy. He'll make an observation and an obvious connection, but he wont 'get' it because that would risk demonetization or a strike. Over time he's trained his brain to be uselessly nerfed.
He tries to hard to be a centrist at times so plays down and makes excuses for ideologically motivated actions.
Blessed fox woman doing the autistic reee-ing we need in these trying times.
*shakes ketchup bottle in solidarity*
Desk ketchup best ketchup.
It doesn't even need to be refrigerated!
You know, I've only watched clips of her here and there but this one I watched completely. She's the one that exposed BRIDGE for the first time and she says she will do some sort of... investigative journalism? to uncover more things. She kept it vague so this is what I remember. I'm happy to hear more from Fox (Lady) News.
You know I'm sensing an echo of history here.
Remember when Harmful Opinions dealt a deathblow to the YouTube "skeptic" scene by exposing them as a bunch of frauds who sold out their own audiences to the lizards behind "Candid"? And then, along with the adpocalypses, lotta these types suddenly all just developed troll's remorse at the same time. With some of them rebranding as wokies who'd "seen the light" on account of some pseudo-intellectual troon's "video essays" that lead them to "grow" and "evolve," blah blah blah.
I'm sensing a similar pattern here, where many "antiwoke" creators are cozying up to woke bullshit while Kirsche is being like Harmful Opinions, a sincere sperg who simply will not let go of the bone no matter how hard her detractors try to deflect with centrist posturing.
FWIW, I first heard about BRIDGE here, not from Kirsche.
That poster probably watched kirsche first
I listened to a few minutes of it and she kept harping on uncovering it like she's James O'Keefe or something
Ok. Post where you heard it first instead of ragging on someone else, or we're getting out the shotglasses, earthworms, and AA batteries.
It's right up there, nicely downvoted by simps defending someone who will never kiss them.
You mean OP of this post? Bridge has already been mentioned even here months ago, and that was someone linking a long ass Kirsche video back then too.
If you're going to lie like that then we're clearly done here.
I was going to just consider you a retard privately and let it go, but now I'll call you a retard publicly.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17siXQ8lPi/dei-is-bridge-now/c/