I care more about the character of the people coming and volume than anything else. I don't want mass migration from Californians as much as I don't want mass migration from Pakistan.
Needs to be skill based, on willingness to integrate and capped by number allowed.
culture is downstream from race. Import indians and you get india, import africans and you get africa. This is the fact of the matter.
If you sent all the Norwegians to Kenya and all the Kenyans to Norway, in a years time, Norway would become 3rd world and Kenya would become first world
If you sent all the Norwegians to Kenya and all the Kenyans to Norway, in a years time, Norway would become 3rd world and Kenya would become first world
I don't know what you were smoking but lay off it for that conclusion mate. Culture is a mix of not just racial but ENVIRONMENTAL factors. You are sliding it down so much to race you ignore ALL the context of WHY they are such a problem.
Ok so let's look at why the illegals in Europe are a problem: they get free hand outs so don't work to give back into society plus that would force them to integrate and learn skills, they are given lighter treatment compared to the native population even for serious offenses like rape and they are not unified group so bring their PREVIOUS grudges with them leading to more sectarian violence on the streets.
So what about the reverse example you gave, we just mass imported Norwegians to Kenya. Well there DEFINITELY wouldn't be any handouts, the environment would be a hazard as while winter might be a bitch for illegals if the establishment didn't give them hotels unlike native homeless in Europe, the Norwegians would suffer massively from heat exhaustion, it'd be hard to adapt the land compared to Norway as it took DECADES to turn some of these places into breadbaskets like Rhodesia was and unlike Europe, you don't have to worry about literal tribal war.
It isn't JUST a race issue, if Europe treated illegals like it's native homeless population, they'd not have as many of them by the millions.
We already did that study. Twice. They're called South Africa and Rhodesia. Both were incredibly successful when Whites were in charge and have gone straight to the shitter as soon as Africans were given power.
Only a leftist is capable of the cognitive dissonance necessary observe the behavior and beliefs of Jews and Muslims and arrive at the conclusion that the former are the bigger threat to civilization.
^^^Of course the guy who comes to the conclusion that muslims are a bigger threat to civilization than jews, would hate the BNP. You people hate any form of White nationalism.
Anyone who thinks racism is bad is a leftist.
It is when it's the ONLY thing you fixate on.
I care more about the character of the people coming and volume than anything else. I don't want mass migration from Californians as much as I don't want mass migration from Pakistan.
Needs to be skill based, on willingness to integrate and capped by number allowed.
culture is downstream from race. Import indians and you get india, import africans and you get africa. This is the fact of the matter.
If you sent all the Norwegians to Kenya and all the Kenyans to Norway, in a years time, Norway would become 3rd world and Kenya would become first world
I don't know what you were smoking but lay off it for that conclusion mate. Culture is a mix of not just racial but ENVIRONMENTAL factors. You are sliding it down so much to race you ignore ALL the context of WHY they are such a problem.
Ok so let's look at why the illegals in Europe are a problem: they get free hand outs so don't work to give back into society plus that would force them to integrate and learn skills, they are given lighter treatment compared to the native population even for serious offenses like rape and they are not unified group so bring their PREVIOUS grudges with them leading to more sectarian violence on the streets.
So what about the reverse example you gave, we just mass imported Norwegians to Kenya. Well there DEFINITELY wouldn't be any handouts, the environment would be a hazard as while winter might be a bitch for illegals if the establishment didn't give them hotels unlike native homeless in Europe, the Norwegians would suffer massively from heat exhaustion, it'd be hard to adapt the land compared to Norway as it took DECADES to turn some of these places into breadbaskets like Rhodesia was and unlike Europe, you don't have to worry about literal tribal war.
It isn't JUST a race issue, if Europe treated illegals like it's native homeless population, they'd not have as many of them by the millions.
Africans never even invented the wheel.
We already did that study. Twice. They're called South Africa and Rhodesia. Both were incredibly successful when Whites were in charge and have gone straight to the shitter as soon as Africans were given power.
Only a leftist is capable of the cognitive dissonance necessary observe the behavior and beliefs of Jews and Muslims and arrive at the conclusion that the former are the bigger threat to civilization.
^^^Of course the guy who comes to the conclusion that muslims are a bigger threat to civilization than jews, would hate the BNP. You people hate any form of White nationalism.
Siding with Muslims is White nationalism. K. Got it. Good talk.
Typical zionist pretends that if you think jews are a bigger threat than Muslims to civilization, that means you side with muslims
Where did I say anything about jews or muslims? You're deranged.