I care more about the character of the people coming and volume than anything else. I don't want mass migration from Californians as much as I don't want mass migration from Pakistan.
Needs to be skill based, on willingness to integrate and capped by number allowed.
If you sent all the Norwegians to Kenya and all the Kenyans to Norway, in a years time, Norway would become 3rd world and Kenya would become first world
I don't know what you were smoking but lay off it for that conclusion mate. Culture is a mix of not just racial but ENVIRONMENTAL factors. You are sliding it down so much to race you ignore ALL the context of WHY they are such a problem.
Ok so let's look at why the illegals in Europe are a problem: they get free hand outs so don't work to give back into society plus that would force them to integrate and learn skills, they are given lighter treatment compared to the native population even for serious offenses like rape and they are not unified group so bring their PREVIOUS grudges with them leading to more sectarian violence on the streets.
So what about the reverse example you gave, we just mass imported Norwegians to Kenya. Well there DEFINITELY wouldn't be any handouts, the environment would be a hazard as while winter might be a bitch for illegals if the establishment didn't give them hotels unlike native homeless in Europe, the Norwegians would suffer massively from heat exhaustion, it'd be hard to adapt the land compared to Norway as it took DECADES to turn some of these places into breadbaskets like Rhodesia was and unlike Europe, you don't have to worry about literal tribal war.
It isn't JUST a race issue, if Europe treated illegals like it's native homeless population, they'd not have as many of them by the millions.
We already did that study. Twice. They're called South Africa and Rhodesia. Both were incredibly successful when Whites were in charge and have gone straight to the shitter as soon as Africans were given power.
Yes but that was done a century ago, are you saying now, with current environment that has let land go to waste and current regional powers as that's a factor too they'd be so successful? That's why I am making the argument, as people are hyper focusing on race than forgetting the WILLFUL submission and cucking of the western establishment and authority to the illegals.
China never developed glass as much as Europe because they preferred tea whereas Europeans grew grapes for wine more so vastly developed glass to showcase it more leading to a technological edge.
Have a better argument to disprove 'muh environment factors'
It is when it's the ONLY thing you fixate on.
I care more about the character of the people coming and volume than anything else. I don't want mass migration from Californians as much as I don't want mass migration from Pakistan.
Needs to be skill based, on willingness to integrate and capped by number allowed.
I don't know what you were smoking but lay off it for that conclusion mate. Culture is a mix of not just racial but ENVIRONMENTAL factors. You are sliding it down so much to race you ignore ALL the context of WHY they are such a problem.
Ok so let's look at why the illegals in Europe are a problem: they get free hand outs so don't work to give back into society plus that would force them to integrate and learn skills, they are given lighter treatment compared to the native population even for serious offenses like rape and they are not unified group so bring their PREVIOUS grudges with them leading to more sectarian violence on the streets.
So what about the reverse example you gave, we just mass imported Norwegians to Kenya. Well there DEFINITELY wouldn't be any handouts, the environment would be a hazard as while winter might be a bitch for illegals if the establishment didn't give them hotels unlike native homeless in Europe, the Norwegians would suffer massively from heat exhaustion, it'd be hard to adapt the land compared to Norway as it took DECADES to turn some of these places into breadbaskets like Rhodesia was and unlike Europe, you don't have to worry about literal tribal war.
It isn't JUST a race issue, if Europe treated illegals like it's native homeless population, they'd not have as many of them by the millions.
We already did that study. Twice. They're called South Africa and Rhodesia. Both were incredibly successful when Whites were in charge and have gone straight to the shitter as soon as Africans were given power.
Yes but that was done a century ago, are you saying now, with current environment that has let land go to waste and current regional powers as that's a factor too they'd be so successful? That's why I am making the argument, as people are hyper focusing on race than forgetting the WILLFUL submission and cucking of the western establishment and authority to the illegals.
China never developed glass as much as Europe because they preferred tea whereas Europeans grew grapes for wine more so vastly developed glass to showcase it more leading to a technological edge.
Have a better argument to disprove 'muh environment factors'