https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Goldstein#Views_on_religion
The only claim I'm making in this post is that this wikipedia article exists and that it contains text, Dom.
In his 2004 book XXX-Communicated: A Rebel Without a Shul, Luke Ford wrote about a conversation with Goldstein, in which Ford asked Goldstein why Jews were dramatically overrepresented in the porn industry. He answered, "The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don't believe in authoritarianism. Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged." Ford then asked, "What does it mean to you to be a Jew?" To which Goldstein responded, "It doesn't mean anything. It means that I'm called a kike."
I frontloaded my point so that others would see it at a decent place in the comment chain. It was a charitable post that provided you with an opportunity to turn leaf and enter an honest discussion. The universe is always offering that to people like you. You choose to ignore that and stick to your initial pilpul, but that is expected and not my problem.
Trying to evade responsibility for shamelessly shilling Wikipedia as a source is anything but 'charitable'.
There are no 'people like me'. Only me.
Wikipedia is not a source, it's an aggregate and I'd been trying to direct the conversation toward the source the entire time. You are so verbose it's hard to believe you are actually that stupid, which is why I call it pilpul, which puts you at being like every two out of a hundred people.
How fascinating. You used it as a source. If you claim that Wikipedia just 'aggregates' sources, then you should have used the source you picked, instead of copy-pasting Wikipedia.
Anti-semitism really is the social justice of the hard-right. You even use the same sources.
Correct, you've been trying to direct the conversation from the source you did use towards towards 'the source' that you didn't.
The more verbose someone is, the dumber he is.
Lol it is a quote from a book. The very first words in the text explain the source. You displayed zero interest in that.
I can only imagine what your rationale for responding is at this point beyond impotently convincing yourself you won le internet argument or pretending to be retarded to waste my time.