Now, look. Listen, Jack. There's a difference between thinking women are weirdos who shouldn't vote, and thinking that Females are engaged in this global conspiracy to murder all men (I miss Imp [and I just checked, he should be coming back from a six month ban any day now, hurrah!]), and I fall into the former camp.
I don't hate women. I love women. No one loves women as much as me. It's tremendous. Bigly. Which is why they should be controlled, and not allowed undue influence to ruin society. The best thing that could ever happen to women is some men saying 'now, hol' up for a second there, sweetheart.'
The global conspiracy thing is kinda nuts, but I don't think it's all that crazy to believe that they want unattractive men to be round up and killed. They genuinely don't think those men should be allowed to inconvenience them with their existence, because they've been shielded from the slightest inconvenience since birth. "Is this man bothering you?" is a question that every female has been asked by a white knight at least once in her life, so why wouldn't they feel entitled to dispose of inconvenient people?
Reminds me of a thread on 4chan where some "women" were trolling everyone by explaining how it's a good thing that the bottom 80% of men are ignored and that they deserved to die off childless.
The gap here is, Imp believes women are engaged in willful and deliberate international conspiracy. As in they are completely in control of their emotions and thoughts and acting in a manner towards a major goal. This is basically saying women are superhuman and more powerful than men could ever be.
Instead of the simple fact that they are short-term thinkers acting on consistent whims with men willing to follow for a crumb of pussy.
...I don't think it's all that crazy to believe that they want unattractive men to be round up and killed.
Yeah, well, you're only slightly less deranged than Imp. But I love you guys anyway, so it's all good.
They genuinely don't think those men should be allowed to inconvenience them with their existence...
True. But that's still a fair distance from death camps. Now, I'm not even saying there aren't a lot of shallow bitches out there who wouldn't shed a tear if "uggos" (sub-9s) were rounded up and genocided, but that's a bit different than cheering it on. They don't care about unattractive men enough to demand they be concentrated.
...because they've been shielded from the slightest inconvenience since birth.
Again, you won't hear me arguing against that point. Female privilege is real, and plenty of females are basically entitled children. But that's still a far cry from some big conspiracy where they want men to die.
I agree with Imp about a lot, but I've never agreed with him that there's a global female conspiracy for world domination, because any such conspiracy comprised of women would dissolve into catty backbiting and mutual loathing and collapse before it ever achieved anything.
I...I really couldn't say. It just wouldn't be polite.
We should definitely not repeal the 19th.
Women are sensible and valid.
angry Impossible1 noises
Now, look. Listen, Jack. There's a difference between thinking women are weirdos who shouldn't vote, and thinking that Females are engaged in this global conspiracy to murder all men (I miss Imp [and I just checked, he should be coming back from a six month ban any day now, hurrah!]), and I fall into the former camp.
I don't hate women. I love women. No one loves women as much as me. It's tremendous. Bigly. Which is why they should be controlled, and not allowed undue influence to ruin society. The best thing that could ever happen to women is some men saying 'now, hol' up for a second there, sweetheart.'
The global conspiracy thing is kinda nuts, but I don't think it's all that crazy to believe that they want unattractive men to be round up and killed. They genuinely don't think those men should be allowed to inconvenience them with their existence, because they've been shielded from the slightest inconvenience since birth. "Is this man bothering you?" is a question that every female has been asked by a white knight at least once in her life, so why wouldn't they feel entitled to dispose of inconvenient people?
Reminds me of a thread on 4chan where some "women" were trolling everyone by explaining how it's a good thing that the bottom 80% of men are ignored and that they deserved to die off childless.
The gap here is, Imp believes women are engaged in willful and deliberate international conspiracy. As in they are completely in control of their emotions and thoughts and acting in a manner towards a major goal. This is basically saying women are superhuman and more powerful than men could ever be.
Instead of the simple fact that they are short-term thinkers acting on consistent whims with men willing to follow for a crumb of pussy.
Yeah, well, you're only slightly less deranged than Imp. But I love you guys anyway, so it's all good.
True. But that's still a fair distance from death camps. Now, I'm not even saying there aren't a lot of shallow bitches out there who wouldn't shed a tear if "uggos" (sub-9s) were rounded up and genocided, but that's a bit different than cheering it on. They don't care about unattractive men enough to demand they be concentrated.
Again, you won't hear me arguing against that point. Female privilege is real, and plenty of females are basically entitled children. But that's still a far cry from some big conspiracy where they want men to die.
I agree with Imp about a lot, but I've never agreed with him that there's a global female conspiracy for world domination, because any such conspiracy comprised of women would dissolve into catty backbiting and mutual loathing and collapse before it ever achieved anything.
Don't talk to me, subhuman scum.