If you study history, you find out that the national socialist party of Germany had been the only political party at the time to forbid women in politics https://archive.md/1qbYb . And yet the German women were fanatical supporters of the national socialists, there had been more women who voted for them than men. . What does that say about women? that they don't need representation at all, they just like strong men.
This is just history DOM. there's nothing here that violates rule 16 ok .
The global conspiracy thing is kinda nuts, but I don't think it's all that crazy to believe that they want unattractive men to be round up and killed. They genuinely don't think those men should be allowed to inconvenience them with their existence, because they've been shielded from the slightest inconvenience since birth. "Is this man bothering you?" is a question that every female has been asked by a white knight at least once in her life, so why wouldn't they feel entitled to dispose of inconvenient people?
Reminds me of a thread on 4chan where some "women" were trolling everyone by explaining how it's a good thing that the bottom 80% of men are ignored and that they deserved to die off childless.
The men are probably better off considering the house of horrors they gleefully subject non-Chads to in divorce court.
The gap here is, Imp believes women are engaged in willful and deliberate international conspiracy. As in they are completely in control of their emotions and thoughts and acting in a manner towards a major goal. This is basically saying women are superhuman and more powerful than men could ever be.
Instead of the simple fact that they are short-term thinkers acting on consistent whims with men willing to follow for a crumb of pussy.
Yeah, well, you're only slightly less deranged than Imp. But I love you guys anyway, so it's all good.
True. But that's still a fair distance from death camps. Now, I'm not even saying there aren't a lot of shallow bitches out there who wouldn't shed a tear if "uggos" (sub-9s) were rounded up and genocided, but that's a bit different than cheering it on. They don't care about unattractive men enough to demand they be concentrated.
Again, you won't hear me arguing against that point. Female privilege is real, and plenty of females are basically entitled children. But that's still a far cry from some big conspiracy where they want men to die.
Note that I said I don't think it's crazy to believe that, not that I actually do. I think they would be perfectly fine with things like death camps, but I don't believe they actively wish for it. They're far too passive from having their every whim catered to. It's their complete lack of empathy that bothers me and frankly makes me doubt their humanity.
No argument. So would a bunch of men. People are easily led: You could convince the majority of both men and women that Group X should be put to the sword or flame, in the right circumstances.
Again, you could say very similar things about your average modern male, too. Everyone is disconnected, everyone is deracinated, everyone thinks they're the main character. It's easy to convince the masses of damn near anything. I'm not saying there's not a trend of females lacking empathy, but it's also far from an exclusively female trait. Modern people are cut off, and would gleefully put the people they view as their Opposition in the camps, because they're retarded and don't know any better.
Apathy in face of evil is indistinguishable from directly supporting it.