I don't care. I'm being evocative because these are the same people who were screaming that "sub-human mudslimes should be shot on sight", and have turned right the fuck around to supporting the men who rape their children.

You were horrified by what happened in Australia during the lockdowns. I bet you had you'd have some 'evocative' language for anyone who called themselves a die-hard anarchist, and then laughed at and belittled the man who set himself on fire due to the lockdowns and injection mandates. You'd probably be a little cruel to someone who rails against the state, and then offers only praise to the state, and mercilessness to anyone who dissents against it, just because he found an excuse to do so. You'd probably have several, choice, evocative words. Words you might have reserved for the savages who built quarantine camps in your country, shot puppies, arrested KFC traffickers, and held children from their parents so they didn't cross provincial lines.

These are people who claim to be racist, and want to protect white people, and know that the white girls in their own community will be openly targeted and raped for sex trafficking, and then turn around and openly support those sex traffickers... simply because they hate jews.

I'd be less evocative if they were just racists. But they're not. They're making a choice: 9,000 raped white children a year, for the price of watching a jew die on snuf post. They go with the latter every time.

I give them nothing but utter, rank, condemnation.