It almost seems forced that they are going viral on social media. Only the fake engagement accounts are posting them as if they're popular. I'm also seeing accounts post merch of these viral females. This makes me hate social media even more. I thought it wasn't possible. Everything seems so artificial because Twitter is now full of people trying to get Elon Musk's ad dollars.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
The whole “keep us divided” narrative is a retarded nonsense psyop peddled by retards and snakes. From the left, it’s an attempt by old school commies to redirect Marxism back to class warfare. From the right, it’s an attempt by neocons to redirect white racial consciousness back to civnat cuckoldry. From the centrists, it’s just pathetically ignorant wishful thinking.
In reality, most of our “divided” groups have no common culture with each other and cannot peacefully or productively coexist in a democracy. All policy and governance in such countries invariably breaks down into racial/ethnic referendum. Civic nationalism was always a thin mask hiding racial/ethnic tribalism.
Diversity + proximity = war. We are inherently divided and hostile towards each other because all properly evolved cultures seek dominance. The fact that we can point to the elites as the ones who forced this failed multiculturalism upon us doesn’t magically erase those incompatibilities.
If a man lets a wolf into your house, that man isn’t trying to “divide you” from the wolf. The man is using the wolf as a weapon against you. You will need to deal with both the wolf and the man in order to survive. There is no future where you and the wolf team up to kill your “true enemy”. If you kill the man first, you are still left with the wolf. And in most cases, the wolf represents the greater immediate threat.
Well said, you put in to words how I have been feeling about this rhetoric.
It's getting kinda of abstract, but as a general rule even though the wolf is more individually dangerous, only the man knows how to get more wolves in, and so should always be the priority as long as more wolves remain outside. Not to mention that the wolf is stupid and driven by instinct, and is far more easily used to attack the man than vice versa.
Always dealing with the most immediate threat isn't wise when the man has demonstrated a desire to continue working to create ever more threats whilst you work to deal with the last. Long-term it is less dangerous to tolerate an immediate risk to cut off infinite future risks.
Thank fucking god someone said it already. "muh division", "muh occupy wallstreet". This is why the KIA subreddit is irrelevant and will stay irrelevant. These people really think that all people are inherently good and tolerant but evil rich people (which they think in 99% of cases are white LMAO) put them against each other.
It's true when you flood nations with different peoples akin to the fall of Babylon. There's no assimilation to a central culture so it's like oil in water. But your implication of people being unable adapt to another culture is just ignorant of human evolution and history (non-normies are capable). In the US, we had means to control the flow and force assimilation, it's just all the natural barriers are gone and the whole is now spoiled. Going back is now incredibly difficult. Divide and conquer can still apply to shattering a nation's monoculture that originally had people coming together for a common ideal.