I don't see this topic come up much as it tends to be considered history despite only being a little over a century ago. As the title suggests, are there any good summaries of what the arguments for and against were at the time? I'd imagine it would make for great reading comparing what was forecast with what happened.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
and keep in mind the 19th was passed shortly after the 16th and by the same people. the league of nations was forming/formed. the same global, internationalist "rules-based order" people knew that having women voting would allow easy subversion of nations and more global policies to crush nationalism.
Only men can really be nationalist because it is men that build, maintain, pay for, and defend everything in the nation. women are not capable of this and never can be.