I don't care about the opinions of feminists But i will say this, One piece has many non sexualized and ugly and fat females. Yet feminists act like the only females that exist in One piece are "sexualized" and beautiful females. The fact that they ignore the ugly and fat females in the manga (fat and ugly females should be something they like) , whilst whining about the sexy and beautiful ones, just shows they just want to erase all of it completely.

Feminists are retarded, and not worth engaging with.

The "male gaze" argument always breaks down to "well, even when men are sexualized, it's still for men, and we women are still oppressed."

What they think is male sexualization is yes, according to the male gaze, what guys think is attractive, not women.

Case in point.

There was a feminist frequencies video

As I said, not worth engaging with. These people are retarded cultists. This was posted in 20-20-fucking-3, I mean, what the fuck else is there to say?

The only thing I will mildly engage with is...

I've posted my opinions on representation of women in a popular anime/manga franchise on the fandom sub; I was criticizing...

A) Normies get out reeeeee, B) leave anime alone, you fucking harpies.

I mean why you would subject yourself to their bizarre bullshit rantings I don't know. But it should be immediately obvious they're lying when they say "being strong and buff and shirtless is a male power fantasy, not what makes men sexy to women."

A 30 second Google shows that Zoro is the number one character for explicit one piece fanfics (NSFW, barely). And it's true for almost any popular series, if there's a jacked badass who keeps taking his shirt off, he's inevitably by far the most popular topic of the semi-literate novellas about being ravished they jill off to in private. In public they just have to lie because it's part of the sisterhood's racket to pretend they're above being shallow bitches who don't want men to have the same fun they get to have.

Is this some kind of advertisement? No thanks I'm not going to reddit.

I think that the comparison to the female character designs in OP are pretty absurd. A male character being drawn to be strong, powerful and showing off his muscular build is not sexualization, thats showing how badass he is, its a male power fantasy.

This tired argument makes their own biases so obvious. A male character being drawn to emphasize their masculinity is seen by the arguer as not-sexual. A female character being drawn to emphasize their femininity is seen by the arguer to be explicitly sexual. It's projection.

A female character being drawn to be "strong, powerful, and showing off her muscular build" would be called sexualization by this same person. It's their own stereotypes of men and women that make them interpret one as sexual and one as not. They think being sexualized is intrinsically female so it's a perfect circular logic in their minds.

Hancock is drawn hot. Ace is drawn hot. Cry more.