I'm trying to remember which boomercon / shabboscon tried to claim that "Christ is King" was the same thing as "black lives matter," claiming that Christians publicly expressing their own religion were engaging in the Marxist linguistic fuckery that is so common today. He, and those who think like him, really betray much about themselves. They don't really believe in Truth, and they certainly don't believe in an individuals duty to the Truth. I question if they understand that other people can care about the Truth, and (gasp!) believe their own religion. It is lost on boomercons (but not Jews) that "Christ is King" is proclaiming the Truth.

What if is isn't the Truth? Then you would expect opponent to challenge it, would you not? Why instead of saying "this is not true," did so many instead chose to say, "this is anti-Semitic"? Why can a skeptic say "Christ is not King," but those at the DW cannot?