“They saw the use of ‘BIPOC’ individuals as a handicap or unwelcome obstacle that could be disregarded if necessary and be evaded or overcome—even if it meant using underhanded and deceptive tactics,” the lawsuit stated. “Further, management at Al Roker Entertainment did not see the PBS DEI mandate as a requirement: It was a box to be checked in the most expedient manner possible.”
That EP is gonna lose, the USSC just handed down a decision last week that gutted DEI. Al Roker is following the law by not complying with the PBS policies. I would fire anyone who complained about that, too, because in doing so they out themselves as a woke cult member, and I will not have such people in my organization.
Wow. I’d be insulted that someone would rather give me janitorial duty on someone else’s script than trust me to come up with ideas. To add insult, he piped up about not dogmatically following the janitorial arrangement.
Lol uhhh based
That EP is gonna lose, the USSC just handed down a decision last week that gutted DEI. Al Roker is following the law by not complying with the PBS policies. I would fire anyone who complained about that, too, because in doing so they out themselves as a woke cult member, and I will not have such people in my organization.
Like every other equity movement it's meant only for certain groups, it isn't about principle.
lol at the white leftist exercising his privilege…
(((white))) leftist.
So ... proof that in-preference exists and can be used as examples against other, globalist type groups that practice the same in-preferences.
You know what should happen but is both discouraged and criminalized?
Hmmm.... I wonder what happened the last time in-preference happened among a certain group of mench.
Wow. I’d be insulted that someone would rather give me janitorial duty on someone else’s script than trust me to come up with ideas. To add insult, he piped up about not dogmatically following the janitorial arrangement.