This is off topic, but can they not determine how much less the property would sell for without the tree and use that to calculate damages? I swear I've heard of cases where they did exactly that.
The other part is definitely fair. It also raises a few questions. How can there be any "conspiracy" about selling an old diary? Are they not admitting that the content of the diary is true with this move?
This is off topic, but can they not determine how much less the property would sell for without the tree and use that to calculate damages? I swear I've heard of cases where they did exactly that.
The other part is definitely fair. It also raises a few questions. How can there be any "conspiracy" about selling an old diary? Are they not admitting that the content of the diary is true with this move?