If you really believed what you're saying, you'd already be out there shooting things up yourself. Instead, you choose to hang out here and try to convince other people to commit terrorism and blackpill them into thinking there are no other viable options. You couldn't glow any brighter.
Your original comment that started this conversation off was:
Bullshit, what about everyone who drove the kid to that point?
I asked why we should feel sorry for him. Then you said:
Because he's white and was driving to such actions. If you've stepped outside in the past couple decades it's easy to see the reasons why he was suffering in such a way.
But then I asked for evidence, and you failed to provide any evidence that he was a victim or that he was enacting any sort of "justified" revenge. You confirmed you were being disingenuous here:
There will always be casualties and his actual intent doesn't even matter, narrative is all that matters and his actions are something we can use to spin such a narrative.
I pointed out that even from a "narrative" perspective, this doesn't help our cause. Then you endorsed his actions by saying:
if enough white men embraced him there would be fear about stepping on our toes once more
Now you're backtracking and claiming that, in spite of endorsing the shooter's actions and saying that we should be following his lead, that you're actually not promoting his actions (totally!) and you just wanted us to feel sorry for him (but we still don't have any reason to feel sorry for him).
Glowie confirmed.
If you really believed what you're saying, you'd already be out there shooting things up yourself. Instead, you choose to hang out here and try to convince other people to commit terrorism and blackpill them into thinking there are no other viable options. You couldn't glow any brighter.
Your original comment that started this conversation off was:
I asked why we should feel sorry for him. Then you said:
But then I asked for evidence, and you failed to provide any evidence that he was a victim or that he was enacting any sort of "justified" revenge. You confirmed you were being disingenuous here:
I pointed out that even from a "narrative" perspective, this doesn't help our cause. Then you endorsed his actions by saying:
Now you're backtracking and claiming that, in spite of endorsing the shooter's actions and saying that we should be following his lead, that you're actually not promoting his actions (totally!) and you just wanted us to feel sorry for him (but we still don't have any reason to feel sorry for him).