I don't know why everyone decided to go after SBI specifically in the first place. There's so many of these companies, and so many other otherwise normal companies that have been infiltrated by these people. The curator shouldn't have just been about SBI, it should have been about any game that peddles ANY kind of woke shit, and then in the description of each game, listed that SBI (or whomever) was involved.
For the same reason the Gillette and Target and Bud Light boycotts each targeted individual companies rather than entire industries. You can't bring your full force to bear on a hundred targets, so you bring your full force on one target at a time, and make the other ones afraid that they'll be next.
in an ideal scenerio you would use these tactics on a string of their more promenet figures like wu or sarkesian in a short timespan to make them radioactive followed by a dump of all the bodies metaphorical or literal they steped on in the way of their ambition if enough tailor a line about how they wont stop and they are very much ends justify the means, bounus show them as a hippocritical liar with their own words and actions. the idea is to have guilt by assosiation set in in the publics mind via exploitation of bias and by witch burning create a schism (they made terf for a reason) opening up more opertunites for backstabing and more fracturing. in execution they likely will have safeguards.
That's the thing mate, we didn't. We are decentralized and only share a sentiment. There is no chain of command in GamerGate. Everything happens spontaneously.
We all chill and rant on this forum from time to time until someone with more agency then the rest of us decides to make an unexpected move.
I don't know why everyone decided to go after SBI specifically in the first place. There's so many of these companies, and so many other otherwise normal companies that have been infiltrated by these people. The curator shouldn't have just been about SBI, it should have been about any game that peddles ANY kind of woke shit, and then in the description of each game, listed that SBI (or whomever) was involved.
For the same reason the Gillette and Target and Bud Light boycotts each targeted individual companies rather than entire industries. You can't bring your full force to bear on a hundred targets, so you bring your full force on one target at a time, and make the other ones afraid that they'll be next.
Finally, someone who knows what he's talking about.
Like the old Chinese proverb: "Execute one to deter a thousand others".
The point is not SBI, but to demonstrate your power and to establish deterrence.
Rules for Radicals. Target a specific person or organization (for totally legal criticism). That’s how you get results.
It's also how you get them to shut down their company, only for them to scatter to other companies and continue doing the same thing with impunity.
true they will do that.
in an ideal scenerio you would use these tactics on a string of their more promenet figures like wu or sarkesian in a short timespan to make them radioactive followed by a dump of all the bodies metaphorical or literal they steped on in the way of their ambition if enough tailor a line about how they wont stop and they are very much ends justify the means, bounus show them as a hippocritical liar with their own words and actions. the idea is to have guilt by assosiation set in in the publics mind via exploitation of bias and by witch burning create a schism (they made terf for a reason) opening up more opertunites for backstabing and more fracturing. in execution they likely will have safeguards.
That's the thing mate, we didn't. We are decentralized and only share a sentiment. There is no chain of command in GamerGate. Everything happens spontaneously. We all chill and rant on this forum from time to time until someone with more agency then the rest of us decides to make an unexpected move.