66 Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a sexual assault case that it was “problematic” for a lower court judge to refer to the alleged victim as a “woman,” implying that the more appropriate term should have been “person with a vagina.” Nobody in the case was trans (archive.is) posted 284 days ago by YesMovement 284 days ago by YesMovement +66 / -0 21 comments share 21 comments share save hide report block hide replies
This is, IMO, fake news.
The full context of the quote, again IMO, makes it pretty clear that the "having a vagina" bit was just to emphasize that everyone that does have one would know when it's being penetrated. In this case in the context of being raped.
Had nothing to do with gender nonsense.