So....the law indicates that men are such manipulative pieces of shit (and the occasional woman the cops accidentally employ) that a wife's husband needs to protect her from other men.
Weird way to interpret it. The statement was more about cops than it was about men.
The fact that most cops are men is almost incidental, but it's still a fact that women are generally more easily intimidated than men, that most cops are armed men who are bigger and stronger than women, and that these cops are generally trained and/or experienced at getting information out of people by almost any means necessary.
It would take a damn strong woman not to fold under pressures like those. A man is less likely to be intimidated by such things.
So....the law indicates that men are such manipulative pieces of shit (and the occasional woman the cops accidentally employ) that a wife's husband needs to protect her from other men.
Weird way to interpret it. The statement was more about cops than it was about men.
The fact that most cops are men is almost incidental, but it's still a fact that women are generally more easily intimidated than men, that most cops are armed men who are bigger and stronger than women, and that these cops are generally trained and/or experienced at getting information out of people by almost any means necessary.
It would take a damn strong woman not to fold under pressures like those. A man is less likely to be intimidated by such things.