The new scaremonger tactic? Christian Nationalism
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
Yes, there's also the Sermon on the Plain.
Paul wasn't an apostle.
I have no problem with the restoration of political Christendom, but Catholic lies are over the line.
You're right, I misremembered 2 Corinthians 11:5 when Paul declares himself in no way inferior to "super-apostles."
I don't give a damn about your Paulite books. So far as I'm concerned there are three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) and John and that's it.
But Paul.... he wasn't at the supper, he doesn't get the title. He was a fanboy at best, a tool of the anti-christ at worst. From my perspective you might as well be talking about Joseph Smith.
You think god has the power to prevent men from being stupid or evil? That's... Calvinism. And I don't think anyone in THIS community is depressed enough to truly believe you're just god's sock puppet in an utterly deterministic universe.
God presents a path. Men choose to walk it. Or not. It wouldn't be the first or last time someone who was close enough to the source to know better took a message and ran with it for their own ends.
Paul did not aim to spread Christ's message. He aimed to create a Church of Christ. That's not the same thing.
You don't get from Christ's words to Quakers being executed for heresy without Paul.
Wow OK... I would rethink the use of curses when discussing divine matters.