The people I listed, I'm pretty sure, do know the verboten subjects. There were several occasions in their live streams where they broached into verboten but relevant topics, began to stray outside the curated boundaries, stopped themselves, and then changed the subject.

This means they should know that the ideas and solutions they're advocating are false. The biggest, is that they still advocate that what we're seeing is due to greed and incompetence. While those do play a part, they're in service to the true motivation, which is malice. Not only are their conversations sticking within the curated confines, their judgments are as well. I'd argue that a lot of red pills can still be dispensed even on censored platforms like Youtube. You can't talk about true causes to problems, but you can talk about all the ancillary effects of those problems, connect the dots, make sound judgments, and refute false information.

However, these grifters are sacrificing accurate discourse for money, truth for greed. Good people don't do that. It means they're untrustworthy. We have enough liars as it is.