The Jean Carroll law that extended the statute of limitations so she could sue Trump was an ex post facto law, specifically prohibited for the states by the Constitution itself (not even relegated to the Bill of Rights).
Also a bill of attainder since it was specifically passed to sue Trump (although since it doesn't mention him by name they'll get away with it).
The fraud case where Trump overvalued Mar-a-lago by 2x and the DA undervalued it by 10x is selective prosecution and an excessive fine, both prohibited by the Bill of Rights.
The 'election interference' case for saying the stolen election was stolen is against the 1st Amendment.
The Jean Carroll law that extended the statute of limitations so she could sue Trump was an ex post facto law, specifically prohibited for the states by the Constitution itself (not even relegated to the Bill of Rights).
Also a bill of attainder since it was specifically passed to sue Trump (although since it doesn't mention him by name they'll get away with it).
The fraud case where Trump overvalued Mar-a-lago by 2x and the DA undervalued it by 10x is selective prosecution and an excessive fine, both prohibited by the Bill of Rights.
The 'election interference' case for saying the stolen election was stolen is against the 1st Amendment.
They've completely lost their minds.