Archive: https://archive.is/qeL2G
For background, Ghey was a transgender teenager who was killed by two other teenagers. Both were sentenced last week to life imprisonment with a minimum of 22 and 20 years respectively. They formulated their plans to kill a number of schoolchildren by befriending them and using plans they researched.
Now Ghey's mother has spoken to the BBC (who else?) to denounce the Internet as the "wild west" and calling for the state to restrict what children can view online in a way that would only work by removing access to the Internet and implementing a UK style Intranet. She also claims that it is impossible for parents to parent their children - therefore the state must intervene - by requiring all technology and what citizens see to be restricted by the state.
As we live in a time where people are treated like children by default, you are assumed to be a child by default (the Online Safety Act requires different treatment for content not "safe for kids" as an example), the desire that people need to be protected from themselves and everything must be done "for the children" and "for your own good".
For example, in North Korea, the general public have no access to the Internet. They do have access to Kwangmyong, the heavily restricted Intranet where everything citizens see and the technology used to access it is wholly controlled by the state.
Another case of not letting a tragedy go to waste.
ETA: Education Minister just told the BBC that they will be expanding age verification to all content not "safe for kids", not just pornography. Their preferred option to be introduced by 2025 is both Government Photo ID and live, on-going facial recognition. They're also not ruling out implementing an Intranet and banning the possession of technological devices for children.
Some background: "Brianna" Ghey (very apt last name) was a dude dressed as a girl. When he was killed, it was immediately framed as a 'hate crime' against the troons, without any evidence, and they tried to use it as a cudgel with which to beat dissenters.
Now it turned out to have nothing at all to do with the fact that he was a cross-dresser, and they're still trying to use it to attack dissent.
For reference his real first name was Brett. It turns out he was killed by a teen girl with a serial killer obsession and a simp she roped into helping her. He also wasn't their intended victim. They originally planned to kill someone else and that fell through for whatever reason.
Right. The police didn't investigate it as a hate crime until the troon activists threw a shit fit.
This reminds me of when Matthew Shepard was murdered by his meth dealer and his gay lover over a drug deal gone bad back in the 90s and the msm reported It as two homophobic rednecks lynching him for being gay.