“It’s not population replacement”
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Imagine that with a NATURAL population decline:
Some jobs have to be done based on the size of infrastructure, and are resistant to population change: Sewers, Roads, Electric Lines. That means less people = better wages. Even though a city might decline 10% in population, the number of Manhours needed to clean and maintain the sewer might only drop 5% due to it's size, for example. Same with highways.
Real Estate would become very affordable as the population would fall below the housing stock. Retail and Warehouses cheaper also. More opportunities to start businesses and become an OWNER.
The Elite want a smaller population by disease, bigPharma, and propaganda, but they don't want it IN the territory of the West that has the highest asset prices, so they bring in Migrants to replace the population but keep the population stable.
The want a generally smaller world pop, but the way to do that would be to stop aiding and trading with 3rd and 4th world countries. The reason they do it this way by flooding the West with immigrants is to maintain high asset prices while reducing wages and engineering the politics for Gibmedats
High quality analysis. I do think there is an element of spiritual warfare at play here, and this manifests as the desire to control. It goes beyond simple accumulation of wealth, as so many woke corporate decisions have demonstrated. People who have “won” the human struggle for resources and security seem to inevitably turn to social engineering. The ones who pathologically seek money are, as a great writer once said, preferable.
Couldn't agree more. These Masters are at a point where the money isn't as important as the power, and imposing their will on the Globe.