If it works it becomes a mongrel English hell, or a mongrel French hell, or a mongrel Germany hell, or a mongrel Italian hell, or a mongrel Ukranian hell, or a mongrel Greek hell.
Don't be dumb. These people are not their own absolutely unique identity that has no dissimilarity in it. Even the Germans (who had a sense of cultural identity prior to the Unification) were still culturally, ethnically, and legally divided and integrated.
Integration under the threat of violence from the monarchy of the dominant ethnicity. You can't force integration through liberal democracy, the best you'll get is everyone sinking to the lowest common denominator of nigger culture. If there are no politicians who pander to the minorities, who don't undermine the country's laws for political gains, the minories will have to assimilate, but if you already have a such high integrity population in the first place, any form of government or economic system could be functional. True civic nationalism has never been tried
"Monarch of the dominant ethnicity" again, doesn't make sense. Most empires are not dominated by a single ethnic group.
Yes, you can force integration through liberal democracy by limiting migration and mandating certain policies. You don't allow enclaves to form in the first place.
True Civic Nationalism has been tried many times, and normally works. To be honest, true Ethno-Nationalism (where one and only one ethnic group exists and forms a single state), is almost literally never done, and normally doesn't form states larger than a few cities.
If it works, it eventually becomes a mongrel Mexican hell, if it doesn't it becomes mongrel Brazilian hell, sounds appealing.
If it works it becomes a mongrel English hell, or a mongrel French hell, or a mongrel Germany hell, or a mongrel Italian hell, or a mongrel Ukranian hell, or a mongrel Greek hell.
Don't be dumb. These people are not their own absolutely unique identity that has no dissimilarity in it. Even the Germans (who had a sense of cultural identity prior to the Unification) were still culturally, ethnically, and legally divided and integrated.
Integration under the threat of violence from the monarchy of the dominant ethnicity. You can't force integration through liberal democracy, the best you'll get is everyone sinking to the lowest common denominator of nigger culture. If there are no politicians who pander to the minorities, who don't undermine the country's laws for political gains, the minories will have to assimilate, but if you already have a such high integrity population in the first place, any form of government or economic system could be functional. True civic nationalism has never been tried
"Monarch of the dominant ethnicity" again, doesn't make sense. Most empires are not dominated by a single ethnic group.
Yes, you can force integration through liberal democracy by limiting migration and mandating certain policies. You don't allow enclaves to form in the first place.
True Civic Nationalism has been tried many times, and normally works. To be honest, true Ethno-Nationalism (where one and only one ethnic group exists and forms a single state), is almost literally never done, and normally doesn't form states larger than a few cities.