I'm not surprised. We have empathy towards those we consider equal or below us. This reveals the hierarchy. Men see each other as equals and women as below them. Women see men as being superior and therefore hold no empathy for them.
I would expect the results to be similar if children are included in the question. Men being equal across the board while women only having empathy for women and children.
A bit surprised that male would have nearly equal response. Men are designed to protect women.
What is the IH Acceptance measured in? Hard to tell how significant this differences are.
I'm not surprised. We have empathy towards those we consider equal or below us. This reveals the hierarchy. Men see each other as equals and women as below them. Women see men as being superior and therefore hold no empathy for them.
I would expect the results to be similar if children are included in the question. Men being equal across the board while women only having empathy for women and children.
This is my untested hypothesis.
I think women's decades of being unlikable hate-filled [deleted because of Rule 16]s have finally overridden the tradcon programming.
I'm not sure, I went over the text again but it doesn't say. I'd guess it's out of ten, with ten being complete acceptance.
Dude we can totally say cunt.
I don't know anymore. I got whacked for making an evolutionary psyche argument. The rules aren't being enforced in good faith.
Just emphasise the non-australian usage of the word, the difference between hanging out with mates and dealing with family courts...
I had more words than that in mind.