I remember another "study" a while back claiming a similar thing, so this is really nothing new, just the usual 1984esque rewriting of history (and reality itself).
I felt like having a chuckle so I read the "article".
They state that women have better physical endurance (due to the action of estrogen), and since pre historic hunting was all about exhausting your prey women had an advantage. They even claim that women have longer strides because birthing hips allow their legs to rotate more.
First thing I have to point out is that to illustrate the piece they used a picture of big titted bimbo Raquel Welch in a movie where she was cast simply to be displayed in loincloths for hungry male eyeballs.
The people who believe this kind of shit really look at a pimped out harlot in some shitty movie as an example of their imagined stronk independent cave woman.
But OK, I'll indulge them. Let's say this was the case. Why are women marathoners slower than men? Why every job that requires physical endurance is dominates by men?
What happened to those neolithic queefing rockets?
Did they have their magical vagina turbo sabotaged by oppressive (yet inferior) men?
The goddamn patriarchy can't keep getting away with this...
They leave out that any animal that required a spear to kill, would either kill the woman, or be out of deadly range.. always. Even cave chicks can't throw.
Yet if you say women were more fit to be gatherers because of said stamina and being able to discriminate objects better than men you are sexist. Women don't have self-respect, they want to be men
Lookat dis pasty ass cracka comin up in my house and gettin all Karen up in my face like she deserve special treatment and shit y'all dont understand what black ppl have to go thru on the day to day all cuz yt jealous we got dat nubian melanin what make us kangz. sheeeit.
I think men's longer legs would add a better advantage for stride length than women's wide hips. I bet 5 seconds of rudimentary testing would prove me right.
Strange that the marathon record is held by a man considering women have so much better endurance... Very strange...
Yeah, the fact that with longer legs men will have larger strides is completely forgotten here. Just like the hand eye coordination that TheMerleOfHaggard mentioned.
And even with any possible benefit that a female hormonal composition might have on endurance, it's completely overshadowed by the even greater benefits that high levels of testosterone give you.
I can’t remember where I read it, but a feminist academic once openly proposed that the field of feminist studies should not concern itself with facts or truth but instead should always focus on advancing the feminist cause by any means necessary. As if abandoning truth is not a complete indictment of their ideology as corrupt and insidious. Judging by their academic output, I think it’s very safe to say that their adherents adopted these power games as sole guiding principle.
The rules change 5 times in the last 5 minutes of the game. It's the perfect encapsulation of the female mindset.
Now that I think about it, if the first movie ended with a Romeo and Juliet style double suicide (the original rules remaining firm), the others movies would be set up for a perfect case of revolution.
I remember another "study" a while back claiming a similar thing, so this is really nothing new, just the usual 1984esque rewriting of history (and reality itself).
I felt like having a chuckle so I read the "article". They state that women have better physical endurance (due to the action of estrogen), and since pre historic hunting was all about exhausting your prey women had an advantage. They even claim that women have longer strides because birthing hips allow their legs to rotate more.
First thing I have to point out is that to illustrate the piece they used a picture of big titted bimbo Raquel Welch in a movie where she was cast simply to be displayed in loincloths for hungry male eyeballs.
The people who believe this kind of shit really look at a pimped out harlot in some shitty movie as an example of their imagined stronk independent cave woman.
But OK, I'll indulge them. Let's say this was the case. Why are women marathoners slower than men? Why every job that requires physical endurance is dominates by men?
What happened to those neolithic queefing rockets? Did they have their magical vagina turbo sabotaged by oppressive (yet inferior) men?
The goddamn patriarchy can't keep getting away with this...
They leave out that any animal that required a spear to kill, would either kill the woman, or be out of deadly range.. always. Even cave chicks can't throw.
And the fact that there are still hunter/gatherer societies that exists today, and guess what, the men hunt while the women gather and do other shit.
Yet if you say women were more fit to be gatherers because of said stamina and being able to discriminate objects better than men you are sexist. Women don't have self-respect, they want to be men
They really are insecure as fuck
How dare you, how absolutely dare you. I want to speak to your manager right now.
Lookat dis pasty ass cracka comin up in my house and gettin all Karen up in my face like she deserve special treatment and shit y'all dont understand what black ppl have to go thru on the day to day all cuz yt jealous we got dat nubian melanin what make us kangz. sheeeit.
It's a certain tribe pushing the idea hard. Women just follow whatever is "trending".
I think men's longer legs would add a better advantage for stride length than women's wide hips. I bet 5 seconds of rudimentary testing would prove me right.
Strange that the marathon record is held by a man considering women have so much better endurance... Very strange...
Yeah, the fact that with longer legs men will have larger strides is completely forgotten here. Just like the hand eye coordination that TheMerleOfHaggard mentioned.
And even with any possible benefit that a female hormonal composition might have on endurance, it's completely overshadowed by the even greater benefits that high levels of testosterone give you.
Discrimination!
Discrimination!
(feminist cope)
It's funny that meaningful biological differences suddenly exist when it's time to throw out some anti-male pseudoscience.
These people stand for nothing. Concepts will be embraced or abandoned entirely based on what bolsters their position in the moment.
I can’t remember where I read it, but a feminist academic once openly proposed that the field of feminist studies should not concern itself with facts or truth but instead should always focus on advancing the feminist cause by any means necessary. As if abandoning truth is not a complete indictment of their ideology as corrupt and insidious. Judging by their academic output, I think it’s very safe to say that their adherents adopted these power games as sole guiding principle.
Have you seen the Hunger Games movie?
The rules change 5 times in the last 5 minutes of the game. It's the perfect encapsulation of the female mindset.
Now that I think about it, if the first movie ended with a Romeo and Juliet style double suicide (the original rules remaining firm), the others movies would be set up for a perfect case of revolution.