To the reader, it isn't. To the magazine, it's the difference between paying a human to write valueless tripe, and having the editors generate it themselves with between 5 and 10 minutes work. When you're 'talent' is indistinguishable from a random number seed and a prediction engine, you don't have any.
Interview people, research facts, uncover news. You can't be replaced by a machine being fed what to say if you're not ALSO doing that already.
SI doesn't pay it's reporting staff to do actual reporting anymore. None of the MSM does. This is why AI is replacing them. No AI can replace James O'Keefe.
None of these "journalists" understand this, either, because if they did this is the angle they would be using to argue against AI.
Add in AI images and we don't even need a swimsuit edition. Heck, we can place the actual athlete's image into an image creator and have him doing anything we want.
But if we can do that, why do we need sports illustrated?
Human or AI generated, no one reads any of this shit. It's just keyword stuffing and brand recognition for SEO, so bots can bump up your page views so you can sell ads that are in turn clicked on by bots. Online advertising has been fraud all the way down for decades.
This is different than fake, human generated articles how?
To the reader, it isn't. To the magazine, it's the difference between paying a human to write valueless tripe, and having the editors generate it themselves with between 5 and 10 minutes work. When you're 'talent' is indistinguishable from a random number seed and a prediction engine, you don't have any.
Interview people, research facts, uncover news. You can't be replaced by a machine being fed what to say if you're not ALSO doing that already.
Agreed
SI doesn't pay it's reporting staff to do actual reporting anymore. None of the MSM does. This is why AI is replacing them. No AI can replace James O'Keefe.
None of these "journalists" understand this, either, because if they did this is the angle they would be using to argue against AI.
The can't gay trap with Ai, yet
Add in AI images and we don't even need a swimsuit edition. Heck, we can place the actual athlete's image into an image creator and have him doing anything we want.
But if we can do that, why do we need sports illustrated?
Said swimsuit issue would probably be a lot hotter and more aesthetic than what they use now.
A roast potato recipe could have hotter shots right now.
Really, the only difference is replacing overly verbose wanking around with incredibly odd grammar and word choices.
Human or AI generated, no one reads any of this shit. It's just keyword stuffing and brand recognition for SEO, so bots can bump up your page views so you can sell ads that are in turn clicked on by bots. Online advertising has been fraud all the way down for decades.