To the reader, it isn't. To the magazine, it's the difference between paying a human to write valueless tripe, and having the editors generate it themselves with between 5 and 10 minutes work. When you're 'talent' is indistinguishable from a random number seed and a prediction engine, you don't have any.
Interview people, research facts, uncover news. You can't be replaced by a machine being fed what to say if you're not ALSO doing that already.
SI doesn't pay it's reporting staff to do actual reporting anymore. None of the MSM does. This is why AI is replacing them. No AI can replace James O'Keefe.
None of these "journalists" understand this, either, because if they did this is the angle they would be using to argue against AI.
To the reader, it isn't. To the magazine, it's the difference between paying a human to write valueless tripe, and having the editors generate it themselves with between 5 and 10 minutes work. When you're 'talent' is indistinguishable from a random number seed and a prediction engine, you don't have any.
Interview people, research facts, uncover news. You can't be replaced by a machine being fed what to say if you're not ALSO doing that already.
Agreed
SI doesn't pay it's reporting staff to do actual reporting anymore. None of the MSM does. This is why AI is replacing them. No AI can replace James O'Keefe.
None of these "journalists" understand this, either, because if they did this is the angle they would be using to argue against AI.
The can't gay trap with Ai, yet