Just saying. It's next to impossible to get the truth there right now because of the possibility of conspiracy to sabotage, hyperbole/lying, and people shouting each other down for doubting this or that. It would be good to have more, say, witnesses to this apparent failure to foresee this attack.
pay no heed to these claims of foreknowledge from a member of an “elite intelligence unit” and reported on by mainstream israeli media - they came from a woman!
I concede going "its wahman" was dumb.
The problem your paraphrase introduces is suggesting any expert disclosure to mainstream media is automatically fact.
If you could tell me that Jerusalem Post is a reliably truthful source (not just approved by NYT/WaPo/CNN equivalents), I'd feel better about trusting this report.
Just saying. It's next to impossible to get the truth there right now because of the possibility of conspiracy to sabotage, hyperbole/lying, and people shouting each other down for doubting this or that. It would be good to have more, say, witnesses to this apparent failure to foresee this attack.
Imp-tier logic m80
I concede going "its wahman" was dumb.
The problem your paraphrase introduces is suggesting any expert disclosure to mainstream media is automatically fact.
If you could tell me that Jerusalem Post is a reliably truthful source (not just approved by NYT/WaPo/CNN equivalents), I'd feel better about trusting this report.
It does nothing more than suggest your out-of-hand dismissal was based on laughable grounds