Which is a bad way to put it because it implies one is better than the other. And the end result of that is where we are now: women wanting to have their cake and eat it, too.
Being exceptional is hard. Especially in social settings. For many, it is hard to find a place where you fit in (or can just be yourself).
Women (being clustered in the center of the bell curve) have advantages in this area. They have an easier time in social environments because will never have a problem finding people they can relate to.
There is nothing wrong with being average in intelligence. It has pros and cons just like being exceptionally smart has pros and cons. Being exceptionally dumb has some advantages, too, believe it or not... though their lives are not something I want to emulate.
I really think this whole thing ends when women realize they don't want the things they claim to want. Which, if past arguments with women are any guide, will be about 2 weeks after they have burned the whole world to ashes.
Men are superior because the bottom percent basically don't exist as far as society is concerned. The average man you would interact with is better than the average women at every objectively measurable task and also most subjectively measurable tasks if the outcomes are broken down into objective criteria.
It's actually ridiculous because even the most beer-swilling redneck dropout has more practical skills like carpentry and mechanics than the most highly educated ivy league female anything.
Best writers, artists, cooks, scientists, doctors, soldiers and etc are all men. Even to this day when they force women into those roles. Even a male somalians can have better potential.. yeah. A shithole country like somalia would look a magnitude better than a country ran by 100% women lol.
men have a wider curve, women a narrower, peakier curve, which means more men will be clustered on either end of the curve
This gets repeated a lot but the actual truth is that the mean of men, for something like 'engineering ability', is greater than the mean for women, not just the variance. It is a male skill, and so men tend to be better at it. If you were talking about 'navigating complex social hierarchies', then of course the mean for women would be greater than men, because that is a feminine skill. Saying that men are women only differ in terms of the 'variance' for various 'masculine' intellectual abilities, rather than the mean, is feminist propaganda. Go on, ask a woman to read a map or navigate her way around a completely new area and see how well she goes.
In fact the whole tweet is very telling. The woman is complaining that the men in an engineering department are acting like men instead of women. The men are focusing on improving their engineering skills to rise up in the male competence hierarchy, how bizarre! And a woman not liking the engineering department because the men aren't acting like women and building some kind of ridiculous female social hierarchy? How could it be! Feminists told me that men and women are identical in every way (except men are more evil), so it can't be true.
Pussyfooting around it doesn't work. Men have to stop doing that and just say "I'm better at it than you. Yes, because I'm a man. You go and do the things you're good at and I'll do what I'm good at."
Men are exceptional; women are average (or as the kids say, mid).
Which is a bad way to put it because it implies one is better than the other. And the end result of that is where we are now: women wanting to have their cake and eat it, too.
Being exceptional is hard. Especially in social settings. For many, it is hard to find a place where you fit in (or can just be yourself).
Women (being clustered in the center of the bell curve) have advantages in this area. They have an easier time in social environments because will never have a problem finding people they can relate to.
There is nothing wrong with being average in intelligence. It has pros and cons just like being exceptionally smart has pros and cons. Being exceptionally dumb has some advantages, too, believe it or not... though their lives are not something I want to emulate.
I really think this whole thing ends when women realize they don't want the things they claim to want. Which, if past arguments with women are any guide, will be about 2 weeks after they have burned the whole world to ashes.
"Exceptional" includes the retards along with the geniuses, but thanks for demonstrating the apex fallacy that women employ by instinct.
Men are superior because the bottom percent basically don't exist as far as society is concerned. The average man you would interact with is better than the average women at every objectively measurable task and also most subjectively measurable tasks if the outcomes are broken down into objective criteria.
It's actually ridiculous because even the most beer-swilling redneck dropout has more practical skills like carpentry and mechanics than the most highly educated ivy league female anything.
Best writers, artists, cooks, scientists, doctors, soldiers and etc are all men. Even to this day when they force women into those roles. Even a male somalians can have better potential.. yeah. A shithole country like somalia would look a magnitude better than a country ran by 100% women lol.
This gets repeated a lot but the actual truth is that the mean of men, for something like 'engineering ability', is greater than the mean for women, not just the variance. It is a male skill, and so men tend to be better at it. If you were talking about 'navigating complex social hierarchies', then of course the mean for women would be greater than men, because that is a feminine skill. Saying that men are women only differ in terms of the 'variance' for various 'masculine' intellectual abilities, rather than the mean, is feminist propaganda. Go on, ask a woman to read a map or navigate her way around a completely new area and see how well she goes.
In fact the whole tweet is very telling. The woman is complaining that the men in an engineering department are acting like men instead of women. The men are focusing on improving their engineering skills to rise up in the male competence hierarchy, how bizarre! And a woman not liking the engineering department because the men aren't acting like women and building some kind of ridiculous female social hierarchy? How could it be! Feminists told me that men and women are identical in every way (except men are more evil), so it can't be true.
Pussyfooting around it doesn't work. Men have to stop doing that and just say "I'm better at it than you. Yes, because I'm a man. You go and do the things you're good at and I'll do what I'm good at."