I think that (taken with some charity) this actually makes a lot of sense in the context of everything else he says about the 'Talmudic' mindset.
He's not so much positing "Jews don't exist" as simply brushing aside the rhetorical//semantic quagmire of 'Jewishness' in order to state his point, establishing up front that he's not going to indulge Talmudic "heads I win, tails you lose" sophistry, instead redirecting the frame entirely.
Two examples to illustrate the intentionally obtuse morass he's side-stepping:
The Israeli constitution grants the "Right of Return" to all Jews. The Israeli constitution then proceeds to define a "Jew" as someone permitted to immigrate to Israel by way of the "Right of Return."
Just one microcosmic instance of something we've all seen play out ad infinitum on the global stage. What is 'Jewishness'? An ethnicity? A religion? A nationality? Pay attention, take notes, and soon you'll begin to notice Jewishness is whatever permutation or combination of these three (or others) serves immediate rhetorical purposes, deftly twisting and morphing, coming and going and even turning on its head in any fashion required to addlepate whichever stupid goy stepped out of line, however contritely, timidly or momentarily.
Soros? Oh he's totally secular, and besides he threw a bunch of Jews under the bus during The Shoah™. Stop juxtaposing how he spends his money with footage of rabbis pontificating on the proper servile station of goyim the world over.
What's that? Louis CK's Netflix special that debuted like a week before he got the #metoo dragnet starts with a whole routine about how stupid the goyim are because they number years preceding the birth of Christ in reverse order, etc...? Cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks. 'White' and 'male' are clearly the only characteristics salient to his misbehavior regarding women.
Talmudic indeed. Pains me to acknowledge it as positively ninja-esque.
Speaking of, the very term anti-Semitic, their bread-and-butter, their perpetual top-deck, is at its core nothing but obfuscation and mendacity. Anyone worth their salt will tell you that 'semitic' is more of a linguistic than ethnic descriptor, and furthermore that it encompasses a much wider category than "Jews" in either case, regardless of that distinction.
If you've been following along though, it isn't hard to grok the utility of misdirecting attention away from your tribe in the very process of tirelessly advancing its interests to the express detriment of others.
Imagine a world where an infamous Goebbels quote rings uncannily perspicacious in retrospect. Oh wait, you don't have to 🤡.
That in a nutshell is why Owen doesn't care.
Compare and contrast other circular 🤡🌎 Greatest Hits such as "My penis is feminine, bigot." and "I changed some definitions. Now 1+1=3, and you're racist, bigot."
This isn't a spur of the moment tweet either, he talked about it years ago on stream, he's been thinking about it a lot and probably has a cork board with red string dedicated to it.
Imagine a person who just uncritically believed everything posted on /pol/, who ODs on red pills daily. This person exists, it is Owen Benjamin.
To me it doesn't matter what he says since his video illustrates the point, truth doesn't matter. Some guy at Kiwifarms also had an interesting observation about them that is very relevant to the thread. Even without looking their names or their early life, people start to understand how they act like. A lot of people are waking up to notice their behaviours.
For a few years, I've seen numerous attempts made at co-opting the words in English and with this video, it seems to click. This year alone, I have come across users in the twitter/x space that spout they love all the beautiful sounding words like truth, honesty, justice, fairness etc, etc in their bio and when you look at tweets or argue with them, they do anything but lying and distorting truth and exploiting compassion. They are vindictive and spiteful, arguing with them to get productive results is a waste of time. I think it's inevitable that we have to understand this way of thinking and I think it has to reach mainstream consciousness at least to the level of politics.
It also seems to reflect the judicial system how it pretends to be fair but it's actually very corrupt and needs a lot of dismissing and fixing the overall system.
Hasn't there been a dispute over there for about a hundred years, maybe even more? That's a long time to be bitter about it.
Hypothetically, let's say there is an amicable to both sides way to end it once and for all.
It will not be enough.
Someone, likely many someones, more than likely on either side, will let it boil and fester and agitate them, and then it'll full circle itself again. It's too late to do anything about it. Like many long standing issues, there is no easy or sure fix for this.
did Owen seriously just say that?
I think that (taken with some charity) this actually makes a lot of sense in the context of everything else he says about the 'Talmudic' mindset.
He's not so much positing "Jews don't exist" as simply brushing aside the rhetorical//semantic quagmire of 'Jewishness' in order to state his point, establishing up front that he's not going to indulge Talmudic "heads I win, tails you lose" sophistry, instead redirecting the frame entirely.
Two examples to illustrate the intentionally obtuse morass he's side-stepping:
The Israeli constitution grants the "Right of Return" to all Jews. The Israeli constitution then proceeds to define a "Jew" as someone permitted to immigrate to Israel by way of the "Right of Return."
Just one microcosmic instance of something we've all seen play out ad infinitum on the global stage. What is 'Jewishness'? An ethnicity? A religion? A nationality? Pay attention, take notes, and soon you'll begin to notice Jewishness is whatever permutation or combination of these three (or others) serves immediate rhetorical purposes, deftly twisting and morphing, coming and going and even turning on its head in any fashion required to addlepate whichever stupid goy stepped out of line, however contritely, timidly or momentarily.
Soros? Oh he's totally secular, and besides he threw a bunch of Jews under the bus during The Shoah™. Stop juxtaposing how he spends his money with footage of rabbis pontificating on the proper servile station of goyim the world over.
What's that? Louis CK's Netflix special that debuted like a week before he got the #metoo dragnet starts with a whole routine about how stupid the goyim are because they number years preceding the birth of Christ in reverse order, etc...? Cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks. 'White' and 'male' are clearly the only characteristics salient to his misbehavior regarding women.
Talmudic indeed. Pains me to acknowledge it as positively ninja-esque.
Speaking of, the very term anti-Semitic, their bread-and-butter, their perpetual top-deck, is at its core nothing but obfuscation and mendacity. Anyone worth their salt will tell you that 'semitic' is more of a linguistic than ethnic descriptor, and furthermore that it encompasses a much wider category than "Jews" in either case, regardless of that distinction.
If you've been following along though, it isn't hard to grok the utility of misdirecting attention away from your tribe in the very process of tirelessly advancing its interests to the express detriment of others.
Imagine a world where an infamous Goebbels quote rings uncannily perspicacious in retrospect. Oh wait, you don't have to 🤡.
That in a nutshell is why Owen doesn't care.
Compare and contrast other circular 🤡🌎 Greatest Hits such as "My penis is feminine, bigot." and "I changed some definitions. Now 1+1=3, and you're racist, bigot."
Some members here also like to play that game
Add it to the list of things he thinks aren't real along with nuclear weapons and the moon landing.
Wut? What did he say?
https://i.imgur.com/xW7pAuJ.jpg
This isn't a spur of the moment tweet either, he talked about it years ago on stream, he's been thinking about it a lot and probably has a cork board with red string dedicated to it.
Imagine a person who just uncritically believed everything posted on /pol/, who ODs on red pills daily. This person exists, it is Owen Benjamin.
To me it doesn't matter what he says since his video illustrates the point, truth doesn't matter. Some guy at Kiwifarms also had an interesting observation about them that is very relevant to the thread. Even without looking their names or their early life, people start to understand how they act like. A lot of people are waking up to notice their behaviours.
For a few years, I've seen numerous attempts made at co-opting the words in English and with this video, it seems to click. This year alone, I have come across users in the twitter/x space that spout they love all the beautiful sounding words like truth, honesty, justice, fairness etc, etc in their bio and when you look at tweets or argue with them, they do anything but lying and distorting truth and exploiting compassion. They are vindictive and spiteful, arguing with them to get productive results is a waste of time. I think it's inevitable that we have to understand this way of thinking and I think it has to reach mainstream consciousness at least to the level of politics.
It also seems to reflect the judicial system how it pretends to be fair but it's actually very corrupt and needs a lot of dismissing and fixing the overall system.
Hasn't there been a dispute over there for about a hundred years, maybe even more? That's a long time to be bitter about it.
Hypothetically, let's say there is an amicable to both sides way to end it once and for all.
It will not be enough.
Someone, likely many someones, more than likely on either side, will let it boil and fester and agitate them, and then it'll full circle itself again. It's too late to do anything about it. Like many long standing issues, there is no easy or sure fix for this.
Will this asshole never go away?