I know without even reading the article all the way through based on these two lines what statistic this moron misinterpreted and she can fuck off completely. No this isn't about rapists and gender roles, you hate men and you think that accusations make a person guilty.
For those who don't know there's actually a bit of deep lore regarding the whole kill all men and all men are rapists mantra. It stems from a little known statistic that claims some ridiculous number of only 2% of men are falsely accused. This was a statistic frequently quoted by feminists to try and debunk the MRA narrative around false rape accusations. The MRAs did some major autism on this one ( which is why feminists went out of their way to scatter the movement ) I'm going off very fuzzy memory on them but being generous even by their standards 4% of court proceeding resulted in a conviction for rape.
Because feminists are the dumbest people on the planet, women like this article writer have interpreted the statistic to mean that 96% of the other cases that end in failure or were thrown out are rapists going free, they actually believe this. I just thought I'd post a bit of background information on why these kind of articles keep popping up even though they were debunked years ago. It's very much the same sort of bullshit they used to justify campus rape hysteria. It's a very persistent belief within the feminist movement and worth noting in case you ever encounter these morons but be sure to look up the study because it's floating around I think and something that feminists like her reference often. Somewhat interesting for me is even the feminists in their arguments on reddit often gave quite widely varying percentages but of course their main claim was that false accusations were extremely low therefore shut up men and stop defending rapists.
2% if I remember the number correctly but yes, you'd think that would be a problem for feminists but as far as they're concerned men's lives are collateral damage in the war against rapists they have going on in their heads because they've got to get that other +90% odd that get off free and they largely blame all the due process in courts for it. Also worth pointing out the the cases sampled were a pretty small number too.
Not to mention how often they use rape and sexual assault interchangeably to inflate the numbers. The 1/4 of women "raped" on campus included sexual harassment a.k.a. being approached or touched innocuously by unattractive men.
The 25% number is ridiculous because college campuses would look like Mogadishu if that was happening. Anybody who can read a number like that and not immediately realize it's wrong is stupid or malicious.
Similarly the stats about women attempting suicide are conflated in several ways.
First, non suicidal self harming is counted, so that's irrelevant actions being included in the numbers.
Second, because of the methods employed when comparing male suicide and female suicide, male suicide attempt numbers end up being lower because the success rate per attempt/individual is significantly higher.
Anyone attempting suicide will fall into roughly 3 vague categories of outcome.
a) managing to succeed
b) changing their mind and getting medical aid
c) failing and surviving long enough to receive medical aid.
The methods involved though mean that when a man tries to kill himself he more often than naught gets it right first time, so there are obviously never going to be any subsequent attempts by those men, therefore men will be a far greater proportion of section a).
Women however in addition to the above point about non suicidal self harming will have far greater numbers in sections b) and c) because their methods are significantly less effective, either because the attempt isn't sincere or due to things like vanity when considering funeral appearances therefore favouring methods which are far less wholly destructive. As such those in sections b) and c) will still be around after to try again, whether fully committed or not to actually succeeding, causing both the increased number of "attempts" by women, and also the significantly lower success rates per attempt/individual.
Nevermind their dumb advertising gimmick--it's not "assisted" suicide if you can climb in a Sarcopod, close the lid, push a button, and voila! Have lunch with Jesus and St. Peter! (Or barbecue with Satan, if that's your destination.)
I know without even reading the article all the way through based on these two lines what statistic this moron misinterpreted and she can fuck off completely. No this isn't about rapists and gender roles, you hate men and you think that accusations make a person guilty.
For those who don't know there's actually a bit of deep lore regarding the whole kill all men and all men are rapists mantra. It stems from a little known statistic that claims some ridiculous number of only 2% of men are falsely accused. This was a statistic frequently quoted by feminists to try and debunk the MRA narrative around false rape accusations. The MRAs did some major autism on this one ( which is why feminists went out of their way to scatter the movement ) I'm going off very fuzzy memory on them but being generous even by their standards 4% of court proceeding resulted in a conviction for rape.
Because feminists are the dumbest people on the planet, women like this article writer have interpreted the statistic to mean that 96% of the other cases that end in failure or were thrown out are rapists going free, they actually believe this. I just thought I'd post a bit of background information on why these kind of articles keep popping up even though they were debunked years ago. It's very much the same sort of bullshit they used to justify campus rape hysteria. It's a very persistent belief within the feminist movement and worth noting in case you ever encounter these morons but be sure to look up the study because it's floating around I think and something that feminists like her reference often. Somewhat interesting for me is even the feminists in their arguments on reddit often gave quite widely varying percentages but of course their main claim was that false accusations were extremely low therefore shut up men and stop defending rapists.
2% if I remember the number correctly but yes, you'd think that would be a problem for feminists but as far as they're concerned men's lives are collateral damage in the war against rapists they have going on in their heads because they've got to get that other +90% odd that get off free and they largely blame all the due process in courts for it. Also worth pointing out the the cases sampled were a pretty small number too.
Not to mention how often they use rape and sexual assault interchangeably to inflate the numbers. The 1/4 of women "raped" on campus included sexual harassment a.k.a. being approached or touched innocuously by unattractive men.
The 25% number is ridiculous because college campuses would look like Mogadishu if that was happening. Anybody who can read a number like that and not immediately realize it's wrong is stupid or malicious.
Similarly the stats about women attempting suicide are conflated in several ways.
First, non suicidal self harming is counted, so that's irrelevant actions being included in the numbers.
Second, because of the methods employed when comparing male suicide and female suicide, male suicide attempt numbers end up being lower because the success rate per attempt/individual is significantly higher.
Anyone attempting suicide will fall into roughly 3 vague categories of outcome.
a) managing to succeed
b) changing their mind and getting medical aid
c) failing and surviving long enough to receive medical aid.
The methods involved though mean that when a man tries to kill himself he more often than naught gets it right first time, so there are obviously never going to be any subsequent attempts by those men, therefore men will be a far greater proportion of section a).
Women however in addition to the above point about non suicidal self harming will have far greater numbers in sections b) and c) because their methods are significantly less effective, either because the attempt isn't sincere or due to things like vanity when considering funeral appearances therefore favouring methods which are far less wholly destructive. As such those in sections b) and c) will still be around after to try again, whether fully committed or not to actually succeeding, causing both the increased number of "attempts" by women, and also the significantly lower success rates per attempt/individual.
Let's get those numbers up across the board. Download/build your very own Sarcopod today! https://www.exitinternational.net/sarco/
Nevermind their dumb advertising gimmick--it's not "assisted" suicide if you can climb in a Sarcopod, close the lid, push a button, and voila! Have lunch with Jesus and St. Peter! (Or barbecue with Satan, if that's your destination.)