I wonder if he ever showed this much restraint reaching conclusions when it comes to statements/policies of Donald Trump, or the motive and actions of J6ers?
��I recently learned that Greenwald effectively endorsed Trump on Tucker on October 29, 2020, saying that the prospect of Democrats winning power was "very alarming" because they are authoritarian.
Odd that this did not settle the question of his partisan preference in the U.S.� link - archive.org - archive.today
Mass civil disobedience is justifiable if it is for a good cause, but not if it is for a bad one. link - archive.org - archive.today
Oh, did the Jews eventually make some headless baby videos? Their propaganda department is quite slow these days. If they didn't have the CIA backing them they'd be up shit creek right now.
While I understand that the journalism should only reflect facts, let's be real. Finding a bunch of headless babies only means one thing. Someone had to behead them, and we all know the middle east goatfuckers love their beheadings.
That's a bit of an overstatement, don't you think?
Maybe those babies decided they didn't want to wait for their necks to develop and chose to take their own heads off.
You don't have video of anyone beheading them, it could be anything- maybe it was climate change or because the babies weren't vaccinated against covid?
I actually support this, and not because JEWS BAD. 'Journalists' all too often maliciously draw conclusions based on insufficient evidence. When you find headless babies, it is certainly a reasonable assumption that they were beheaded by Hamas, but that is taking it beyond the evidence.
People that get blown up are often headless, as well as armless and other things depending on what happens. When the body comes apart, it does so at predictable joints.
And then they were showing all these burnt up corpses which could be from anything. They could have been burned alive, and beheaded, for all I know, but you can't tell from the end state.
I try to think of all possibilities, no matter how remote they are. For example, if Ukrainians found dead headless babies, my conclusion wouldn't immediately be that Russher did it.
Of course, Hamas is sui generis when it comes to evil, so I do consider it highly likely that they did it - but still I don't want 'journalists' to do my thinking for me.
I wonder if he ever showed this much restraint reaching conclusions when it comes to statements/policies of Donald Trump, or the motive and actions of J6ers?
Oh, did the Jews eventually make some headless baby videos? Their propaganda department is quite slow these days. If they didn't have the CIA backing them they'd be up shit creek right now.
While I understand that the journalism should only reflect facts, let's be real. Finding a bunch of headless babies only means one thing. Someone had to behead them, and we all know the middle east goatfuckers love their beheadings.
Planned parenthood, too.
That's a bit of an overstatement, don't you think?
Maybe those babies decided they didn't want to wait for their necks to develop and chose to take their own heads off.
You don't have video of anyone beheading them, it could be anything- maybe it was climate change or because the babies weren't vaccinated against covid?
Definitely climate change.
I actually support this, and not because JEWS BAD. 'Journalists' all too often maliciously draw conclusions based on insufficient evidence. When you find headless babies, it is certainly a reasonable assumption that they were beheaded by Hamas, but that is taking it beyond the evidence.
Separation of fact and inference.
People that get blown up are often headless, as well as armless and other things depending on what happens. When the body comes apart, it does so at predictable joints.
And then they were showing all these burnt up corpses which could be from anything. They could have been burned alive, and beheaded, for all I know, but you can't tell from the end state.
Find headless babies
???
maliciously draw conclusion that someone beheaded them
"Could have been the wind!"
I try to think of all possibilities, no matter how remote they are. For example, if Ukrainians found dead headless babies, my conclusion wouldn't immediately be that Russher did it.
Of course, Hamas is sui generis when it comes to evil, so I do consider it highly likely that they did it - but still I don't want 'journalists' to do my thinking for me.