-
is there is any group of people who should go out of their way to not dehumanize their enemies - what is the name of this group?
-
do you support ethno-nationalism in general, or only for chosenites?
-
if you don’t support ethno-nationalism in general, why do you support the ethno-nationalist, racist, apartheid, anti-christian government of israel?
-
if you oppose some aspects of the zionist movement, do you feel compelled to stay silent about those subjects “lest you provide grist for mUh AnTi-sEmiTes”?
I’ll edit in any other good questions that people suggest
Not really lol, no, you didn’t answer much of any of the questions I raised, you just explained why you feel the extermination of the muslims is justified. More power to you, but that’s not what this thread is about. You’ve certainly had an unlikely life!
Not at all "unlikely": I'm half American and half British. I spend most of my time either in NYC or in London (now the countryside, thank fuck). Both places that your Muslim pals love to attack so much.
It's impossible to avoid them in the UK. They're everywhere, in a country they hate. The US is getting worse and worse for Niqabs and burkhas ever time I visit. At least NYC is. And I never said anything about extermination. Don't put any fucking words in my mouth, you mong. I said GONE. As in, either DEPORTED to the Middle East, or Africa, or wherever. That, or jailed.
Who put the Muslim there? Who ran the boat?
You get angry at the animal while ignoring those who let it out of its cage.
Oh, you mean Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi?
"Whittaker Chambers described the future originator of Pan-Europe as "practically a Pan-European organization himself." He elaborated: "The Coudenhoves were a wealthy Flemish family that fled to Austria during the French Revolution. The Kalergis were a wealthy Greek family from Crete. The line has been further crossed with Poles, Norwegians, Balts, French and Germans".[6] The Kalergis family roots claim their descent from Byzantine royalty via Venetian aristocracy, connecting with the Phokas imperial dynasty. In 1300, Coudenhove-Kalergi's ancestor Alexios Phokas-Kalergis signed the treaty that made Crete a dominion of Venice."
That was his father's family. His mother was a Japanese commoner.
Not a Jew. A mixed race Austrian-Japanese aristocrat.
I’ll take “What is a shabbos” for 2,000 Alex
I think any reasonable person would agree that surviving (or experiencing, or whatever word you want to use) three terrorist attacks over 6 years is indeed a rather “unlikely” series of events.
You (and the other people avoiding answering the actual questions asked) are the only one bringing up muslims dude. I made this thread about zionists and for some reason you’re ranting about muslims.
Why do you think the hordes of “refugees” from these countries exist? Does it have anything to do with the endless banker-wars we’ve been fighting in the Middle East for 70 years (largely at Israel’s behest)? If so, what % of the influx is due to these actions? Should we stop doing the things which produce the hordes of refugees, or keep doing them?
Maybe we just close the borders of the West and expell the foreigners?
If only our politicians took our borders and citizenship in our nations even half as seriously and solemnly as they take israeli borders and citizenship
Unfortunately I don’t think that can happen until everyone reckons with the reality of zionism. If everyone just came out and said “I support the right of an ethnicity to national self-determination” (or not), that would be fine and dandy, and discussion could move us forward, but as long as this “rules for thee, but not for me” / “as a fellow white person, we must do X” bullshit is allowed to play out, the more people are created who’s only option is to violently, mindlessly, lash out around themselves. Atleast, that’s my perception of things.
I think he answered it quite adeptly. He outlined past experience as to why having non-ethnostates was a bad thing for his own personal life, which answers Q2 in the affirmative (and thus invalidates Q3, which is conditional on Q2 being in the negative). While Q1 was left out, it has an obvious expected answer. Q4 was answered indirectly in the final three endnote paragraphs: He clearly does not mind looking bad to the public eye, in order to preach his message.
So to translate into Graphenium for you from what I get from his post:
Indifference.
In general, clearly!
N/A due to "2" being affirmative.
Clearly not.
Oddly no ones gotten that one yet