-
is there is any group of people who should go out of their way to not dehumanize their enemies - what is the name of this group?
-
do you support ethno-nationalism in general, or only for chosenites?
-
if you don’t support ethno-nationalism in general, why do you support the ethno-nationalist, racist, apartheid, anti-christian government of israel?
-
if you oppose some aspects of the zionist movement, do you feel compelled to stay silent about those subjects “lest you provide grist for mUh AnTi-sEmiTes”?
I’ll edit in any other good questions that people suggest
I was in NYC for 9/11, was back in London for 7/7, and was caught up in the near miss that was the 2007 Haymarket car bomb attack meant to level the Tiger Tiger club. That last one was very close to the bone, We were evacuated, shaken badly. We walked home through Picadillly (all tubes and buses were shut down in response) as we walked up heavily Muslim Edgeware Road suddenly there were block after block of screaming muslims in the street, shouting at any non-muslims, punch-drunk with angry happiness. That was a bit of a shock too.
The next day we woke up to find that the very SAME terrorists who nearly killed us had fled in the night up to Scotland and then attacked Glasgow airport. This was the source of the famous image, if you recall, of a Glaswegian man bravely physically attacking one of the terrorists. The terrorist was a fucking NHS doctor. I remember none of us could process that last bit. I remember the mayor of London Ken Livingstone was on Radio 4 telling us that it had nothing to do with Islam, but that Israel was illegitimate, and that was the reason for these "justifiable" attacks. Again we were stunned and completely confused.
The following year I moved to a gorgeous old house in the East End, in Spitalfields, owned by someone who gave it to us at peppercorn rent on the understanding that we would move out as soon as the approved architect was ready to go to work on it, and that in the meantime we would keep "the locals" from stealing the valuable 18th century fireplaces, installations and cornices (they would steal them and then sell them back to the house owners, quite the thing in 2010's Spitalfields) very near ultra-Muslim Brick Lane.
That was the final straw. Living in a Muslim neighborhood as a white was fucking awful. They are the most racist motherfuckers I have ever come across in my life. They kept trying to break into our house through the roof (yes, really) and tried to drive us out of the house because, I was told, they wanted it to house Muslims as it was so near to the Brick Lane Mosque, which was on the corner of my street. They tried to intimidate us out of the house and once shoved shit through the letterbox. Police did absofuckinglutely nothing. We finally gave them what they wanted and left. Near- zero rent was not even sufficiently compensatory for living near Muslims who wanted to harm us.
Cumulative result: I FUCKING HATE ISLAM. I HATE IT. I WANT IT GONE.
So no, I'm not a "Zionist", I am just a normal Londoner who has had first hand experience of what Muslims want for me and my kind. My philosophy forevermore will be FUCK MUSLIMS AND ALL WHO SUPPORT MUSLIMS. I WANT THEM GONE.
Does that answer your question, OP?
Not really lol, no, you didn’t answer much of any of the questions I raised, you just explained why you feel the extermination of the muslims is justified. More power to you, but that’s not what this thread is about. You’ve certainly had an unlikely life!
Not at all "unlikely": I'm half American and half British. I spend most of my time either in NYC or in London (now the countryside, thank fuck). Both places that your Muslim pals love to attack so much.
It's impossible to avoid them in the UK. They're everywhere, in a country they hate. The US is getting worse and worse for Niqabs and burkhas ever time I visit. At least NYC is. And I never said anything about extermination. Don't put any fucking words in my mouth, you mong. I said GONE. As in, either DEPORTED to the Middle East, or Africa, or wherever. That, or jailed.
Who put the Muslim there? Who ran the boat?
You get angry at the animal while ignoring those who let it out of its cage.
Oh, you mean Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi?
"Whittaker Chambers described the future originator of Pan-Europe as "practically a Pan-European organization himself." He elaborated: "The Coudenhoves were a wealthy Flemish family that fled to Austria during the French Revolution. The Kalergis were a wealthy Greek family from Crete. The line has been further crossed with Poles, Norwegians, Balts, French and Germans".[6] The Kalergis family roots claim their descent from Byzantine royalty via Venetian aristocracy, connecting with the Phokas imperial dynasty. In 1300, Coudenhove-Kalergi's ancestor Alexios Phokas-Kalergis signed the treaty that made Crete a dominion of Venice."
That was his father's family. His mother was a Japanese commoner.
Not a Jew. A mixed race Austrian-Japanese aristocrat.
I think any reasonable person would agree that surviving (or experiencing, or whatever word you want to use) three terrorist attacks over 6 years is indeed a rather “unlikely” series of events.
You (and the other people avoiding answering the actual questions asked) are the only one bringing up muslims dude. I made this thread about zionists and for some reason you’re ranting about muslims.
Why do you think the hordes of “refugees” from these countries exist? Does it have anything to do with the endless banker-wars we’ve been fighting in the Middle East for 70 years (largely at Israel’s behest)? If so, what % of the influx is due to these actions? Should we stop doing the things which produce the hordes of refugees, or keep doing them?
Maybe we just close the borders of the West and expell the foreigners?
I think he answered it quite adeptly. He outlined past experience as to why having non-ethnostates was a bad thing for his own personal life, which answers Q2 in the affirmative (and thus invalidates Q3, which is conditional on Q2 being in the negative). While Q1 was left out, it has an obvious expected answer. Q4 was answered indirectly in the final three endnote paragraphs: He clearly does not mind looking bad to the public eye, in order to preach his message.
So to translate into Graphenium for you from what I get from his post:
Indifference.
In general, clearly!
N/A due to "2" being affirmative.
Clearly not.
Oddly no ones gotten that one yet
Yeah, but what about the jews? - op
I agree they're shitbags and should all get deported out of the west, and I wouldn't shed a tear if the middle east got glassed entirely.