-
is there is any group of people who should go out of their way to not dehumanize their enemies - what is the name of this group?
-
do you support ethno-nationalism in general, or only for chosenites?
-
if you don’t support ethno-nationalism in general, why do you support the ethno-nationalist, racist, apartheid, anti-christian government of israel?
-
if you oppose some aspects of the zionist movement, do you feel compelled to stay silent about those subjects “lest you provide grist for mUh AnTi-sEmiTes”?
I’ll edit in any other good questions that people suggest
Maybe we just close the borders of the West and expell the foreigners?
If only our politicians took our borders and citizenship in our nations even half as seriously and solemnly as they take israeli borders and citizenship
Unfortunately I don’t think that can happen until everyone reckons with the reality of zionism. If everyone just came out and said “I support the right of an ethnicity to national self-determination” (or not), that would be fine and dandy, and discussion could move us forward, but as long as this “rules for thee, but not for me” / “as a fellow white person, we must do X” bullshit is allowed to play out, the more people are created who’s only option is to violently, mindlessly, lash out around themselves. Atleast, that’s my perception of things.
While correct, it doesn't really address what I was saying.
The outcome you're going to get is not one in which the iniquitous "refugees" or their parent cultures will be rewarded for their despoiling of the West and abuse of hospitality. But rather the opposite.
If you want the globalists to stop screwing with people, well so do we all. But the influx of muslims attacking the European peoples of the world is going to end in the kind of punitive measures that get a capital letter in the history books.
Do you see the invasion of these people as a direct result of the actions of the globalists? I’m talking about their anger at the west and their ability to enter the countries of the west through various means (lax immigration standards, NGOs, “refugee” status, “asylum” claims, sneaking across undefended borders, etc) - because I see them as inexorable, and more so, one directly causing the other.
You may think it’s naive, pointing to the crusades or rightly identifying islam as a religion of conquest, but I think it’s the best way to avoid, as you imply, starting a new chapter of history (which I just frankly don’t see going well, given how utterly in the grasp of the anti-humans the world is now).
You know the idea of the “root-cause analysis”? What do you see as the root cause of terrorism?
No, because they wouldn't be there without their own decisions to do so. Humans have free will, and much though I am loathe to classify the misbegotten arab race as humans they are so nonetheless.
They made the contemptible choice to defacto invade the West, and that is a choice that they will eventually be punished for.
As for the ability to enter, yes I blame the globalists or the left of whatever your preferred name is for the enemy. Open borders certainly are not an organic policy that any polity chose without the interference of the proverbial they in the political process. Which is of course an argument still further for the expulsion of foreigners.
You ask what the root cause of terrorism is. I'll assume you mean actual terrorism and not just asymmetric or attrition warfare as practiced by say, the VietCong.
Denial.
Terrorism is caused by a desire to do battle against a perceived opponent, typically a stronger one, matched with an inability to actually do so. To have this combination is to deny reality, to refuse to accept a real loss, denying the reality that you aren't capable of actually conducting battle, if you ever were.
But the desire to cause harm outweighs the acceptance of reality. That is terrorism.