I'm skeptical of some of Peterson's claims for my own reasons, particularly because I don't buy all the Jungian stuff. Unfortunately, the attitude here is basically "everyone is controlled opposition". But Peterson has been making some anti-neocon noises (saying that believing the Ua will defeat Ru is childish), but unfortunately some very naive pro-neocon ones as well (specifically in an emotional reaction against the Iranian regime's outrages against its people).
Peterson himself has publicly stated that it was the rise of the alt-right that animated him, not anything the left was doing. His whole reason for getting up in the morning is running a de-radicalization gayop on white people. Of course he is trying to funnel people back into the pre-Trump status quo, where whites just quietly surrender our country and let ourselves get dispossessed and disenfranchised.
Peterson himself has publicly stated that it was the rise of the alt-right that animated him, not anything the left was doing.
He's said from the beginning that part of the reason he opposes the craziness of the left because he thinks that something like Nazism may spring up as a result.
Of course he is trying to funnel people back into the pre-Trump status quo, where whites just quietly surrender our country and let ourselves get dispossessed and disenfranchised.
He's part of the post-Trump status quo though. Or is this how you view everyone who is opposed to white IDPol as well as every IDPol - leaving aside for a moment your long-standing claim about alleged Jewish IDPol.
There is no "alleged." He works for Ben Shapiro and has had cordial, softball interviews of Netanyahu. No, you don't get to leave that aside. His answer for anti-Semitism is for Jews to do idpol, to the point of building an entire country out of it. His answer for anti-White is for whites to clean our rooms.
100% of "anti-idpol" Zionist public figures are gayops, and there are a ton of them.
Patrick Bet David.
I'm skeptical of some of Peterson's claims for my own reasons, particularly because I don't buy all the Jungian stuff. Unfortunately, the attitude here is basically "everyone is controlled opposition". But Peterson has been making some anti-neocon noises (saying that believing the Ua will defeat Ru is childish), but unfortunately some very naive pro-neocon ones as well (specifically in an emotional reaction against the Iranian regime's outrages against its people).
Peterson himself has publicly stated that it was the rise of the alt-right that animated him, not anything the left was doing. His whole reason for getting up in the morning is running a de-radicalization gayop on white people. Of course he is trying to funnel people back into the pre-Trump status quo, where whites just quietly surrender our country and let ourselves get dispossessed and disenfranchised.
He's said from the beginning that part of the reason he opposes the craziness of the left because he thinks that something like Nazism may spring up as a result.
He's part of the post-Trump status quo though. Or is this how you view everyone who is opposed to white IDPol as well as every IDPol - leaving aside for a moment your long-standing claim about alleged Jewish IDPol.
There is no "alleged." He works for Ben Shapiro and has had cordial, softball interviews of Netanyahu. No, you don't get to leave that aside. His answer for anti-Semitism is for Jews to do idpol, to the point of building an entire country out of it. His answer for anti-White is for whites to clean our rooms.
100% of "anti-idpol" Zionist public figures are gayops, and there are a ton of them.
Great, if a country with 20% Arabs is "IDPol", you must love multiculturalism as a supporter of "IDPol".
I care little about hating on "Zionism".