"Give women the vote", they said... "What harm could it do", they said
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
I'd even say the rise of single white females is directly correlated to women being allowed to vote. They vote for all these social programs in droves so they can replace men with daddy government.
There’s also the fact we haven’t had an actual male president since Eisenhower thanks to women voters.
Why Eisenhower?
The last wartime general turned president. Also the last respected general to run for president.
The televised presidential debates. Kennedy won the female vote entirely off physical appearance on television. Studies showed that everyone who listened to the debates versus watched say Nixon won and Vice versa.
The last president to warn about the globohomo complex.
The urge to open "blue markets" by enfranchising new voters and then buying their votes is the critical flaw of democracy. Unless you hard-code voting limits it will always be corrupted eventually.
Notice we are running into the absurd final form of this policy by simply enfranchising the entire world. In the future "voting" will just be clickfarms in india and whoever pays the most Pajeets wins.
Bitter childless catladies are like incels. They go insane and want to burn down the whole world.
The rise of feminism would not have been enough to destroy conservatism without the help of mass immigration. Electoral maps of white America are still a slam dunk for conservatism despite the input of single white woke women. Any map that includes non-whites immediately turns 100% democrat. So the calculus is pretty obvious. Any efforts to curtail the destructive influence of feminism are pointless so long as the borders remain open.
It's because of a purposely useless GOP political class that the borders remain open. Partly due to feminism, but not mostly.