You didn't comment on the fact that he clearly proclaimed to be in favor of Homophobia laws, something you were denying in your first commentary.

I also appreciate that you showed us the canons of the catechism, but unfortunately, nobody here disagrees with the church's doctrine. Who disagrees with the catechism is Fr Lancelotti. Let's take a look at this specific fragment from the catechism:

Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.

Any moral teaching based on orthodoxy must remind lay people that homosexual acts and tendencies are a disorder and must be avoided and suppressed.

Now let's see what Fr Lancelotti has to say:

Being LGBT is a sin? To sin is to act inhumanely. One may be hetero or LGBT or trans and be inhumane.

Is this the teaching of catechism? I don't think so! In my opinion he refuses to proclaim that homosexual acts are in fact a sin.

In fact, he even says that official declarations of the catholic church do not matter, and he even hopes that someday the church will change its doctrine to "accommodate LGBT people entriely".

Anyway, I just picked Fr Lancelotti as an example, because the Brazilian clergy is full of liberal traitors, like Fr Ticão who makes thematic masses dedicated to the "holy herb" Marijuana, or father Jose Pinto who liked to fight racism dancing vodoo songs in the middle of the sunday mass.