Honestly, I think playersexual is often the right call (and I find the term funny), as long as it's done well. I don't think every character should be (as that takes away from uniqueness big time), but I think it's a nice option, as long characters keep their mouths shut until the player initiates something. Sadly, playersexual often ends up just being 'gay' because these woke companies want to shove all that gayness onto us.
It's annoying they're so intent on not letting us have nice things.
The problem is that the left does not understand camaraderie, even straight leftist men can't comprehend it. So any relationship that normally creates among guys during tough times for them is just being gay.
Yeah, that's why in many of these games the companions that swing either way will always be much more notable as gay.
Because you can accidentally just be nice or supportive and the writers consider that flirtatious and initiate the gay route. Whereas the noncompatiable orientation ones give you much more bro shit and alternatives.
Even worse, this only applies to the cocks. The lesbo party members are usually the hardest to seduce because the opposite is in play, where you only have like 5 specific lines you can ever say to clue her in that you want to clamslam and everything else is just friendzoning.
Default (Where characters have predetermined sexualities, mostly straight)
All Straight
All Romanable/Playersexual
Custom (Choose each character individually)
You know leftist locusts would freak out about something like that, even though it just lets everyone play as they want. Because they're authoritarians.
That would solved the "un-uniqueness" that the article is clamoring about but i honestly doubt thats what they want. They are just pissed off there is still straight options for players.
I don't like this approach and it's never done well. By its very nature, it can't be done well because its entire purpose is not about writing engaging characters. It's about reducing them to different flavors of fuckability to cover as many player tastes as possible. People behave differently around and to other people depending on their sex (and race and background and social class, and the values of the society both of them were brought up in), and playersexuality removes that outright just so that no player feels "excluded" from experiencing their sex fantasy in a video game.
Honestly, I think playersexual is often the right call (and I find the term funny), as long as it's done well. I don't think every character should be (as that takes away from uniqueness big time), but I think it's a nice option, as long characters keep their mouths shut until the player initiates something. Sadly, playersexual often ends up just being 'gay' because these woke companies want to shove all that gayness onto us.
It's annoying they're so intent on not letting us have nice things.
The problem is that the left does not understand camaraderie, even straight leftist men can't comprehend it. So any relationship that normally creates among guys during tough times for them is just being gay.
Yeah, that's why in many of these games the companions that swing either way will always be much more notable as gay.
Because you can accidentally just be nice or supportive and the writers consider that flirtatious and initiate the gay route. Whereas the noncompatiable orientation ones give you much more bro shit and alternatives.
Even worse, this only applies to the cocks. The lesbo party members are usually the hardest to seduce because the opposite is in play, where you only have like 5 specific lines you can ever say to clue her in that you want to clamslam and everything else is just friendzoning.
This exactly; if you congratulate the wizard Gale on banging a literal goddess then next thing you know he'll be trying to show you his wand.
Maybe let the player make the selection pre-game and preserve some sense of immersion.
Yeah, something like
Default (Where characters have predetermined sexualities, mostly straight)
All Straight
All Romanable/Playersexual
Custom (Choose each character individually)
You know leftist locusts would freak out about something like that, even though it just lets everyone play as they want. Because they're authoritarians.
That would solved the "un-uniqueness" that the article is clamoring about but i honestly doubt thats what they want. They are just pissed off there is still straight options for players.
I don't like this approach and it's never done well. By its very nature, it can't be done well because its entire purpose is not about writing engaging characters. It's about reducing them to different flavors of fuckability to cover as many player tastes as possible. People behave differently around and to other people depending on their sex (and race and background and social class, and the values of the society both of them were brought up in), and playersexuality removes that outright just so that no player feels "excluded" from experiencing their sex fantasy in a video game.