Because fucktard Draxoids took the word "universal" literally, instead of understanding that stuff is for citizens (they also cheat by making citizenship as easy to get as Halloween candy.)
Neither are good, but you can sustain welfare OR immigration for a while, things seem ok with just one. One will lead to the other though, and then the combo will destroy you very quickly.
Open immigration but no welfare incentive will initially bring in relative hardworking foreigners, but they'll want their families in too and vote for laxer standards. Meanwhile welfare creates weak gov-dependent people who vote for immigration. Not understanding 'universal' isn't the issue. It was always doomed to follow this path.
The old libertarian circle argument that you can have one or the other but not both isn't right. It misses the later consequences, having one will set the stage for the other to come along. You can sustain just one for a while and won't fall off the cliff immediately, but you are still eventually fucked.
The biggest problem is treating welfare like it's a way of life, when it should be a fucking hand-up as needed, and linked with employers. Employers should NOT be allowed to hire immigrants if there is even one fucking native-born on the welfare rolls.
He doesn't fit the bill? Fucking train him. I hate hearing the lie that immigrants do stuff whites "won't do". No, you just put all kinds of requirements on us that immigrants either are exempt of, or they get the help that welfare won't give us. And one of the biggest things is a fucking "employment gap" counting against us, but not against fucking so-hard-done-by foreign trash.
How about corruption is only allowed to happen and continue happening for long periods in a large diverse groups of people..... I.E Diversity is their greatest strange to continue corruption
Because fucktard Draxoids took the word "universal" literally, instead of understanding that stuff is for citizens (they also cheat by making citizenship as easy to get as Halloween candy.)
Neither are good, but you can sustain welfare OR immigration for a while, things seem ok with just one. One will lead to the other though, and then the combo will destroy you very quickly.
Open immigration but no welfare incentive will initially bring in relative hardworking foreigners, but they'll want their families in too and vote for laxer standards. Meanwhile welfare creates weak gov-dependent people who vote for immigration. Not understanding 'universal' isn't the issue. It was always doomed to follow this path.
The old libertarian circle argument that you can have one or the other but not both isn't right. It misses the later consequences, having one will set the stage for the other to come along. You can sustain just one for a while and won't fall off the cliff immediately, but you are still eventually fucked.
The biggest problem is treating welfare like it's a way of life, when it should be a fucking hand-up as needed, and linked with employers. Employers should NOT be allowed to hire immigrants if there is even one fucking native-born on the welfare rolls.
He doesn't fit the bill? Fucking train him. I hate hearing the lie that immigrants do stuff whites "won't do". No, you just put all kinds of requirements on us that immigrants either are exempt of, or they get the help that welfare won't give us. And one of the biggest things is a fucking "employment gap" counting against us, but not against fucking so-hard-done-by foreign trash.
How about corruption is only allowed to happen and continue happening for long periods in a large diverse groups of people..... I.E Diversity is their greatest strange to continue corruption