Logically you'd have to take the odds the gloves were in the short period where they are both new and not grimy to compare against to the odds that somebody misrepresented a video on Twitter. I think you maybe can even see the palms get grimy during the video.
Then you can decide what's more likely and base your views on that.
Lying on twitter vs like <1% time window of non-filthy gloves; "easily dismissed" becomes "easily delusional" against those kinds of odds.
Logically you'd have to take the odds the gloves were in the short period where they are both new and not grimy to compare against to the odds that somebody misrepresented a video on Twitter. I think you maybe can even see the palms get grimy during the video.
Then you can decide what's more likely and base your views on that.
Lying on twitter vs like <1% time window of non-filthy gloves; "easily dismissed" becomes "easily delusional" against those kinds of odds.