They'll tell you it's a strength because it brings a wider range of ideas/solutions to the table.
Which relies on the premise that different ethnicities think differently by default. Which is sort of true, but not in the way they mean, and not in a way that leads to improved outcomes in business or government.
A black man raised by his mother and father in an affluent neighborhood in Connecticut will have far more in common with his white neighbors than he will with a black man raised by a single mother in a ghetto in Baltimore.
Until it’s politically or economically more convenient to be “black”. There are just as many white raised Krapernicks and Obamas who sold out for the race grift as there are Sowell’s, Thomas’s and Carson’s who lifted themselves from poverty.
Anyone ever debated someone who believes “diversity is our strength”. I’d love to make them explain exactly how and why
They'll tell you it's a strength because it brings a wider range of ideas/solutions to the table.
Which relies on the premise that different ethnicities think differently by default. Which is sort of true, but not in the way they mean, and not in a way that leads to improved outcomes in business or government.
A black man raised by his mother and father in an affluent neighborhood in Connecticut will have far more in common with his white neighbors than he will with a black man raised by a single mother in a ghetto in Baltimore.
Until it’s politically or economically more convenient to be “black”. There are just as many white raised Krapernicks and Obamas who sold out for the race grift as there are Sowell’s, Thomas’s and Carson’s who lifted themselves from poverty.
Were white nations struggling before mass immigration of non-whites? No. So why was mass immigration of non-whites necessary?
If you believe the current propaganda you'll hear that immigrants helped rebuild, nay, outright rebuilt countries after WW2.
I mean, socially somewhat true. Unfortunately they were communists, socialists, and other terrible people.
My best guess is that it was done by the elites because the cost of mass migration is borne by the poorest in society.
The poorest people were never asked if they were ok with the mass migration.
To push wages (or rather, wage growth) down. That is literally all it is…
Obviously different in places without minimum wages, but the principle still applies…
Essentially, non-white immigrants will work shit jobs, in shit conditions, generally with little recourse to complain…
The same reason why so many jobs went offshore, including every fucking call centre: because again, they cost less…
Also, and this is arguably even more evil: because it keeps demand, and therefore prices, going up… Especially for housing.
That is probably the biggest factor. Without it, the housing bubble never would have happened…
These fuckers built the entire system on endless mass immigration, and now we see the consequences…